Fix the population of the union.impls field#89276
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Sep 29, 2021
Merged
Conversation
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
Contributor
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @GuillaumeGomez (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2021
Member
|
Thanks! @bors: r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 88ff75c has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2021
…omez Fix the population of the `union.impls` field This pull-request fix the population of the `union.impls` field that was forgot when the `Union` type was introduce as a split from the `Struct` type rust-lang#81500. `@rustbot` label +T-rustdoc +A-rustdoc-json
This was referenced Sep 28, 2021
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2021
…laumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#87260 (Libgccjit codegen) - rust-lang#89212 (x.py: run `rustup toolchain link` in setup) - rust-lang#89233 (Hide `<...> defined here` note if the source is not available) - rust-lang#89235 (make junit output more consistent with default format) - rust-lang#89255 (Fix incorrect disambiguation suggestion for associated items) - rust-lang#89276 (Fix the population of the `union.impls` field) - rust-lang#89283 (Add regression test for issue rust-lang#83564) - rust-lang#89318 (rustc_session: Remove lint store from `Session`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull-request fix the population of the
union.implsfield that was forgot when theUniontype was introduce as a split from theStructtype #81500.@rustbot label +T-rustdoc +A-rustdoc-json