Remove hack ignoring unused attributes for stage 0 std#89760
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 12, 2021
Merged
Remove hack ignoring unused attributes for stage 0 std#89760bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
This seems to no longer be giving spurious errors when incremental is enabled.
jyn514
added
C-cleanup
Contributor
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
@bors r+ Seems worth a try, we can always re-add this if necessary. |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 1b283d4 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2021
…ark-Simulacrum Remove hack ignoring unused attributes for stage 0 std This seems to no longer be giving spurious errors when incremental is enabled. Closes rust-lang#58633.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 12, 2021
…askrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#89471 (Use Ancestory to check default fn in const impl instead of comparing idents) - rust-lang#89643 (Fix inherent impl overlap check.) - rust-lang#89651 (Add `Poll::ready` and revert stabilization of `task::ready!`) - rust-lang#89675 (Re-use TypeChecker instead of passing around some of its fields ) - rust-lang#89710 (Add long explanation for error E0482) - rust-lang#89756 (Greatly reduce amount of debuginfo compiled for bootstrap itself) - rust-lang#89760 (Remove hack ignoring unused attributes for stage 0 std) - rust-lang#89772 (Fix function-names test for GDB 10.1) - rust-lang#89785 (Fix ICE when compiling nightly std/rustc on beta compiler) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Member
Probably because the problem was papered over with #67101? If we remove that hack, we might have to re-add this hack. Probably best to not touch anything and keep status quo ... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This seems to no longer be giving spurious errors when incremental is
enabled.
Closes #58633.