Destabilise entry_insert#94105
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @m-ou-se (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Mark-Simulacrum
added
beta-accepted
Member
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 319dd15 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2022
…=Mark-Simulacrum Destabilise entry_insert See: rust-lang#90345 I didn't revert the rename that was done in that PR, I left it as `entry_insert`. Additionally, before that PR, `VacantEntry::insert_entry` seemingly had no stability attribute on it? I kept the attribute, just made it an unstable one, same as the one on `Entry`. There didn't seem to be any mention of this in the RELEASES.md, so I don't think there's anything for me to do other than this?
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (cb4ee81): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
Mark-Simulacrum
removed
the
beta-nominated
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2022
…imulacrum [stable] 1.59.0 release This adds in a few backports: * Destabilise entry_insert rust-lang#94105 * Update compiler_builtins to fix duplicate symbols in armv7-linux-androideabi rlib rust-lang#93436 This also includes a fresh commit replicating the 1.52.1 patch soft-disabling incremental for 1.59, in light of discussion on rust-lang#94124. This hasn't yet been fully approved but I think is the likely way things will go, so preparing the first round of stable artifacts with that in mind. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
ghost
deleted the
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See: #90345
I didn't revert the rename that was done in that PR, I left it as
entry_insert.Additionally, before that PR,
VacantEntry::insert_entryseemingly had no stability attribute on it? I kept the attribute, just made it an unstable one, same as the one onEntry.There didn't seem to be any mention of this in the RELEASES.md, so I don't think there's anything for me to do other than this?