[bootstrap] Don't print Suite not skipped unless --verbose is set#95370
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Mar 28, 2022
Merged
[bootstrap] Don't print Suite not skipped unless --verbose is set#95370bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Suite not skipped unless --verbose is set#95370bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
This was so verbose before that it made it hard to see what effect the flag actually had.
Before:
```
Set({test::src/tools/tidy}) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Tidy" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui) because it is excluded
Suite(test::src/test/run-pass-valgrind) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::RunPassValgrind" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/mir-opt) because it is excluded
Suite(test::src/test/codegen) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Codegen" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Suite(test::src/test/codegen-units) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::CodegenUnits" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Suite(test::src/test/assembly) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Assembly" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Suite(test::src/test/incremental) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Incremental" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/debuginfo) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui-fulldeps) because it is excluded
... about 100 more lines ...
```
After:
```
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/mir-opt) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/debuginfo) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui-fulldeps) because it is excluded
```
Contributor
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit be8ce35 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2022
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95301 (Remove `Nonterminal::NtTT`.) - rust-lang#95314 (Tell users that `||` operators are not currently supported in let chain expressions) - rust-lang#95350 (resolve: Simplify some diagnostic code to avoid an ICE) - rust-lang#95370 ([bootstrap] Don't print `Suite not skipped` unless `--verbose` is set) - rust-lang#95390 (Ignore doc comments in a declarative macro matcher.) - rust-lang#95401 (Remove duplicated and unused test files) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was so verbose before that it made it hard to see what effect the flag actually had.
Before:
After: