I. Introduction. The information in this paragraph is provided so that new readers will have an understanding of the sources of information for the articles that are written.
A. This series of articles focuses on a study of the Gospel Of Matthew, which takes place through a consistent, literal, grammatical, historical and contextual interpretation of God’s Inspired Word.
B. We all read things that other people have written. Therefore, it is necessary for all whom study the works of biblical commentators to choose, for their references, those writers whom have gained the trust of their peers as it relates to the knowledge of scriptural truth and context. The theological scholars that are identified in this series of articles have been found to be faithful to the requirements of the goals of Biblical truth and context.
C. The contents in this article, and those that follow, rely heavily on the writings of such theological scholars as those of the following faculty members of Dallas Theological Seminary (DTS), which was founded in 1924. DTS is well known for its curriculum on Eschatology (Study of last things).A list of my references is shown in my Page, “My References.”
1. Lewis Sperry Chafer, D.Div., Litt. D (1871—1952) was the primary founder of the Dallas Theological Seminary (1924; then Evangelical Theological College), an institution widely considered the academic front-runner of dispensationalist theology. Besides serving as the college’s first president and principal theologian, Chafer was a musician, evangelist, and frequent Bible conference speaker. Although he wrote many popular books on prophecy, evangelism, and Christian living, Lewis Sperry Chafer’s most enduring work was his eight-volume Systematic Theology, the first theological textbook framed within a dispensational, premillennial view.
2. John F. Walvoord, Th. B., Th. M., Th. D., D. Div., received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1931. That fall Walvoord entered the fledgling Dallas Seminary, where he earned his bachelor’s and master’s of theology (Th. B., Th.M.) degrees, magna cum laude, in 1934 and doctorate in theology (Th.D.) in 1936. He went on to receive an M.A. in philosophy from Texas Christian University in 1945. Wheaton College awarded him a doctor of divinity (D.D.) in 1960; Liberty University conferred the Doctor of Letters (Litt.D.) on him in 1984; he taught at Dallas Theological Seminary (DTS) for 50 years, during which time he was President of DTS for 34 years, dying at age 92
3. Charles C. Ryrie, Th. M. Th. D., Ph. D., taught elsewhere for 40 years, and 20 years at DTS, dying shy of his 91st birthday. Dr. Charles Caldwell Ryrie (b. 1925) has died only weeks before his ninety-first birthday. Dr. Ryrie taught Systematic Theology at Dallas Theological Seminary before serving as dean of doctoral studies for more than two decades until his retirement in 1983. He passed away on February 16, 2016. Although Ryrie left Haverford before completing his studies there, Haverford conferred his B.A. (1946) on the basis of his work at DTS. A year later, Ryrie received his Th.M. (1947), and two years following that, his Th.D. (1949). He went on to complete a Ph. D. (1953) at the University of Edinburgh, and he later received a Litt.D. from Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, now Liberty University School of Divinity.
4. J. Dwight Pentecost, B.A., Th. M., Th. D., taught for 58 years at Dallas Theological Seminary. “Dr. P,” as he was affectionately known on the DTS campus, began his time at the seminary in 1937 as the one hundredth student at the then twelve-year-old school. From 1958 through 1973, Dr. P served concurrently as a DTS professor and senior pastor of Grace Bible Church in North Dallas. As he completed his doctorate in theology, the seminary’s president at the time, Dr. John F. Walvoord invited Dr. Pentecost to join the DTS faculty, where he served until his death.
5. Notable DTS Graduates. Robert Jeffress, David Jeremiah, J. Vernon McGee, Charles Swindoll.
6. The works of other faculty or graduates of DTS, or of other such minded theological scholars, may also be consulted.
7. Dates that are provided in this article come from the Scofield Study Bible (1909 A.D.) and the Ryrie Study Bible (1986 A.D.).
8. It is important to know that the Gospel of Matthew is not a Christian apologetic, in that there was no offer of a Christian personal salvation, or loss of such salvation.
a. The offer of salvation that Jesus offered to first Century Israel,was that of a national salvation of Israel from the persecution of Gentile empires, which would be based on the acceptance by Israel of Jesus being God’s chosen King of the earthly Kingdom of God, that was, and still is, yet future(30 A.D.).b. The audience of Jesus was Jews of first century Israel (30 A.D.). Matthew wrote the Gospel, after the Day Of The Jewish Feast Of Pentecost (33 A.D.), when Jews came to belief in Christ as their personal Savior. Matthew’s Gospel was written to Jews who had believed in Christ for Salvation, to make known to those Jews that Jesus was God’s choice to be the King of the Kingdom of God on earth (which is still yet future).c. The date of the writing of Matthew’s Gospel was prior to the destruction of Jerusalem (70 A.D.), and was likely to have been between 50 and 60 A.D., although the preferred date is 51 A.D. Jews who had come under the OT teaching of Jesus in 30 A.D. (Book of Matthew), would have been present during the “Day of the Jewish Day of Pentecost,” when the Apostle Peter preached the first Gospel message of the Christian Dispensation (Acts 2:1-36, 33 A.D.).
9. As you read my articles it is important to remember that, just as Luke’s gospel was based on the discussions that he had with Jewish eye-witnesses of the life of Christ (Lk 1:2), my articles are based on the sermons and articles of highly educated theological scholars whom are students of the written Word of God, to include the languages in which the Scriptures were written. I serve as an investigative reporter, who draws no conclusions, other than those which have already been drawn by such scholars, as I have described above.
10. My resources, both individual and institutional, are both independent and non-denominational; therefore, there they have no denominational axes to grind.
II. Discussion. Introduction.
Matthew Chapter 13 – Part -4 -The Parables
A. As we consider the teaching of the parables, it is important for us to have an understanding of the context of the subject by understanding three significant factors. If we do not have a proper knowledge of either of the factors, confusion and error will enter into the correctness of the teaching of the subject of the parables.
B. Each of the factors relate to the understanding of the context of the word “Kingdom.” Many writers state that “Kingdom of Heaven and Kingdom of God” have the same meaning. Let’s consider the following verses.
1. Ps 103:19, “The Lord has established his throne in heaven; his kingdom extends over everything.” This verse explains the “Kingdom Of Heaven,” of which Yahweh wells, and in which only righteousness reigns.
2. 2 Sam 7:12-13. “When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.” This prophecy is from Yahweh, to Nathan the prophet, to Israel’s king David. This Kingdom is the literal, earthly, Davidic “Kingdom of God,” over which Yeshua will establish and rule and reign for 1,000 years (Mt 24:29-30; Rev 20:1-6) at the end of the tribulation. During this period of time, it will begin with total righteousness. Survivors of the Tribulation, Per, Mt 25:34, 46b, who have come to faith in Christ will enter the Kingdom Age (Millennium), as “born again believers,” but not as having purified resurrection bodies (body, soul and spirit). Because these believers will exist in mortal bodies, they will be able to marry and conceive and bear children, in the Kingdom. Such children will also bear children, but of whom must come to belief in Christ. During the Kingdom Age, many such “kingdom born children” will not come to believe in Jesus, and will oppose the righteousness of Yahweh and Yeshua, and will rebel against Godliness at the end of the Kingdom Age (Rev 20:7-9).
3. Matt 13:11. Jesus answered them, “To you it has been granted to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been granted. Over which Yahweh has authority (Ps 103:19), there is a time period that He did not give prophetic knowledge to His Old Testament prophets, but has now given such understanding in the New Testament, e.g. Christ and the church (Eph 5:32); and the Rapture, 1 Cor 15:51).
4. Matt 13:1-52. These verses tell of the time during which Yeshua will be absent from the earth, and of the sinful conditions that will exist on earth during that time. This time period is often called a “mystery kingdom,” but it is actually a “mystery of Yahweh of whom is in heaven.” Such a period of time was not made known to Old Testament Jewish prophets, but now is being made known to pre-kingdom Jews, by John the Baptist, Mt 3:2, Yahweh, Mt 4:17; and the disciples, Mt 10:5-7. This mystery “of heaven” relates to the time that is elapsing between the first and second advents of Messiah, and is actually “the inter-advent age,” as opposed to “mystery kingdom, or kingdom of heaven” In this article, I have inserted “inter-advent age,” when it correctly identifies the terms, “mystery kingdom or kingdom of heaven.”
III. The Parables. Matthew Chapter 13:1-51.
A. Yeshua had occasionally used parables to illustrate His teaching (e.g., Mt 7:24-27; 9:15-17; 11:16-19; 12:43-45). Rising opposition led Him to use them more. Now, He began to use parables to reveal new truth about the kingdom. Chapter 13 contains Christ’s third major discourse in Matthew, “His Parables about the Kingdom.” Matthew presented the first two discourses as uninterrupted monologues by Messiah, except for a question and answer at Mt 18:21-22). He interrupted this third discourse frequently with narrative introductions.
B. The parables are divided into four spoken in public, and four spoken in private;
1. The evidence goes to show that the first four are the new treasures of truth, and the last four are the old (that is, truths revealed before).
2. Therefore, the present Age is presented in a series of eight progressive pictures, describing the course of the kingdom in mystery. (Mystery being truth which had not been told by God to Old Testament prophets).
C. The New Things.
1.The Seed and the Sower.
2.The Wheat and the Tares.
3. The Mustard Seed.
4. The Leaven.
D. The Old Things.
1.The Treasure.
2.The Pearl Of Great Price.
3. The Dragnet.
4. The Householder.
IV. The Parables Described.
In this article we will discuss the first two parables. In the following article will discuss the remaining parables.
A. A Parable Of The Sower (13:1-23).
1. The scene of this prophetic sermon of Yeshua was the Sea of Galilee. Because of the great multitudes thronging the shores, He went into a small boat a short distance from the shore, and by this means, was able to command a view of the entire multitude. While they stood, Christ sat in the boat in the role of a religious teacher.
2. The first paragraph does not have the precise formula of the later paragraphs, “The inter-advent age is likened unto,” but is, rather, an introductory parable, serving as a basis for all that follows. In the parable, a sower went forth to sow, sowing his seed upon four kinds of earth. Although sometimes the ground was prepared by plowing, in other cases, seed would be sown with no preparation whatsoever, which seems to be the case in this parable. Some of the seed fell on the wayside (i.e., the hard-beaten path), where there was no receptivity, and fowl came and devoured it. Some seed fell on the second type of soil defined as “stony places” (v. 5). This refers to stony ground with sufficient soil to allow the seed to sprout but with insufficient depth to allow adequate roots. Beginning to grow, the new plants withered in the heat of the sun.
3. Some seed fell among thorns, that is, soil that was good enough but full of weeds. Here, the competition of the thorns was too much, and the young plants were choked out. The fourth soil receiving the seed was described as “good ground” (v. 8), bringing forth seed up to one hundredfold. In each case, the seed is the same, but the difference is in the receptivity of the soil.
4. In the conclusion of His presentation of the parable of the sower, Yeshua made the challenge, “Who has ears to hear, let him hear” (v. 9). Later, after Christ had sent the multitude away (v. 36), the disciples came to Him to ask why He spoke unto them in parables. His explanation was that it was proper for them, His disciples, to know the mysteries of the inter-advent age, but to the people who were largely unbelieving, it was not. Christ declared the principle, “For whoever has, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whoever has not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath” (v. 12). Accordingly, Messiah stated that He spoke in parables that the unbelievers might not understand and would thereby fulfill the prophecy of Isa 6:9-10, that the people would not hear the message. His disciples, however, were to be blessed by this new revelation which was not revealed to the prophets and the righteous men of old but was now being revealed to them (Mt 13:17). This confirms the previous definition of a mystery as a truth not revealed in the Old Testament but now revealed in the New Testament.
5. Some have found it difficult to harmonize the concept that truth is revealed in such a way that unbelievers cannot understand it. The point is that there is a long background of unbelief and disregard of previous revelation. Accordingly, when additional revelation is given to believers, it is couched in terms that only they will understand. In a sense, unbelievers have sinned away their day of opportunity. It is in keeping with the principle that darkness follows light that has been rejected.
6. In Mt 13:18-23, the parable of the sower is explained. The birds that devoured the seed by the wayside represented satanic influence, which supports the hardness of the heart that rejects the message. The seed on shallow ground pictured superficial reception of the Word, where the Word does not bear fruit. The seed among thorns depicted “the care of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches” which choke the Word and make it unfruitful (v. 22). The seed on the good ground, which brings forth fruit up to an hundredfold, represented the one who not only hears the Word but understands it and lets it bring forth its fruit abundantly.
7. As this parable makes plain, there is no anticipation in the present inter-advent age that there will be universal reception of the truth, as post-millenarians teach. Most of those who hear the message of the earthly Davidic kingdom will reject it. Some, however, will receive the message, cherish it in their heart, and believe in the truth of the kingdom. This first parable establishes the basic character of the present age, awaiting the return of the rejected King. The age will include some who believe, many who will not believe.
B. Parable of the Tares (13:24-30; 36-43).
1. In the second parable, Yeshua likewise used the figure of a sower, but this time, dealt with the character of the seed rather than its reception. In this parable, the sower sowed the good seed, described as wheat, and the enemy sowed tares, referring to rye grass, the darnel which often grows up with the wheat. One side effect of the darnel seed is that it is subject to a parasite fungus, which infects seed and is poisonous to both men and beasts.
2. In the parable, when the servants asked whether they should uproot the tares, the instruction was to let both go to the harvest time, because uprooting the tares would also uproot the wheat. Accordingly, Christ stated, “Let both grow together until the harvest” (v. 30). Magistrates and churches may remove the openly wicked from their society; the outwardly good who are unworldly worthless they must leave; for the judging of hearts is beyond their sphere.” At the harvest, the tares are gathered first, then the wheat is gathered into the barn.
3. In the interpretation in Mt 13:36-43, when the disciples later privately asked Yeshua concerning the meaning of this parable, He identified the field as our present age, the sower as the Son of man (Yeshua) who sowed the good seed, the enemy as the devil who sowed the tares. The good seed represented the children of the Davidic kingdom, and the tares the children of the wicked one, that is, the devil. The reapers were identified as the angels; the time of the harvest was “the end of this age,” or more properly translated, “the consummation of the current inter-advent age.” The judgment was described as a work of the angels, gathering out of the end of this present age any that would offend, and then casting them into a furnace of fire. The judgment is parallel to that described in Mt 25:31-46, where the sheep are separated from the goats (Gentiles). Ezekiel 20:34-38 (Jews).
4. Post-tribulationists have made much of the order of the judgment described in 13:30, that is, that the tares are gathered first and that later the wheat is gathered into the barn. This is used as an argument for post-tribulationism, or the teaching that the rapture occurs in connection with the establishment of the kingdom. This argument, however, is invalid.
5. Matthew Chapter 13 is not dealing specifically with the church age, which is the period between Pentecost and the rapture, but with the entire period of the inter-advent age, that is, the period between the first and second advents, during which the King (Yeshua) is absent from the earth, and which includes the period between the rapture and the second coming. The rapture is not in view at all. As far as the order of events is concerned, in the seventh parable, where the good and bad fish are separated, the order is reversed with the good gathered first. The Rapture (Thes 4:16-17) will precede the tribulation, which will remove Gentiles from the earth so that God can deal with Jews (Jer 30:7) to lead them to belief in Christ. The Rapture is the event that ends the Church Age.
6. A reasonable conclusion is that the order of events is indeed the destruction of the wicked and the ushering in of the righteous to the Davidic kingdom; however, both are simultaneous events in fulfillment, although actually the tares are destroyed before the kingdom is brought in fully.
7. The second parable, as a whole, makes clear the dual line of development within the sphere of profession, with the true believer not clearly identified until the time of judgment. This parable is not a picture of the universal triumph of the gospel, as the postmillennialists teach; neither is it a fulfillment of an earthly reign where Christ is supreme on earth. Rather it is the period before the return of the King, who was rejected in His first coming.
V. Consider.
1. “The Kingdom of Heaven relates to the dwelling place of God, and his overall sovereignty over the world that He created (Ps 103:19). There are writers who state that the Kingdom Of Heaven and the Kingdom Of God are the same. The significance of Kingdom of God is that it is the literal, earthly, 1,000 year time of the reign of Yeshua, over all of Yahweh’s created world, and is established by Yeshua when He returns to earth from Heaven at the end of the tribulation (Mt 24:29-30), We can conclude that the kingdom of God is the same as the Messianic Kingdom, and the Davidic Kingdom, but not of the Kingdom of Heaven. When Matthew writes “Kingdom Of Heaven,” he is discussing the time and conditions that exist, and is existing, between the two advents of Yeshua. The “Kingdom of God, Davidic Kingdom, Messianic kingdom, Millennial Kingdom,” also relate to the gift of Yahweh to Israel, through the Abrahamic Covenant.
2. Matthew uses the phrase “kingdom of heaven” thirty-one times, and is the only gospel writer who uses it at all. The other three use “kingdom of God.” It is probable that Matthew used kingdom of heaven because it was more understandable to his primarily Jewish readers. Jews would not speak God’s name (Yahweh), and would often substitute heaven when referring to Him, much as we do in such expressions as “heaven smiled on me today.” Also, it is important to remember that when Matthew states “kingdom of heaven,” he is relating to the inter-advent age that exists between the first and second advents of Messiah. There are writers who also relate to the “inter-advent age” as the “mystery kingdom.” The “mystery” is that the inter-advent age is a time period of which Old Testament prophets were not given any prophetic knowledge by Yahweh.
3.Kingdom of Heaven is relatable to the time in which we are now living (the inter-advent age), in which saved and unsaved people live, “side by side.” At the end of the inter-advent age the wheat (saved) and tares (unsaved) will be separated,with only the saved entering the Kingdom Age.