feat(c++): implement xlang serialization for c++#2925
Merged
chaokunyang merged 34 commits intoapache:mainfrom Nov 26, 2025
Merged
feat(c++): implement xlang serialization for c++#2925chaokunyang merged 34 commits intoapache:mainfrom
chaokunyang merged 34 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
chaokunyang
changed the title
chaokunyang
changed the title
chaokunyang
force-pushed
the
align_cpp_java_serde
branch
from
14f6aa4 to
e8088cc
Compare
pandalee99
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2025
chaokunyang
force-pushed
the
align_cpp_java_serde
branch
from
00f6dc6 to
6f42acf
Compare
theweipeng
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why?
#2908 implemented c++ serialization framework, but don't fully implement xlang spec, and don't align with java/rust.
What does this PR do?
Related issues
#2906
Closes #2909
Closes #1543
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Benchmark