-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
ctfe validation on unaligned references does not mention expected / provided alignment #58617
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsE-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.E-mentorCall for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-const-evalArea: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)Area: Constant evaluation, covers all const contexts (static, const fn, ...)A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsE-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.E-mentorCall for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
This code (playground):
errors under miri with
This snippet, however (playground):
errors with
It would be great if this error about the validity of references would also state that "alignment 1, but alignment 8 is required" or similar.
cc @oli-obk @RalfJung