Remove visit_expr_post from ast Visitor#132107
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 24, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @petrochenkov (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#131790 (Document textual format of SocketAddrV{4,6}) - rust-lang#131983 (Stabilize shorter-tail-lifetimes) - rust-lang#132097 (sanitizer.md: LeakSanitizer is not supported on aarch64 macOS) - rust-lang#132107 (Remove visit_expr_post from ast Visitor) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#132107 - maxcabrajac:remove_expr_post, r=petrochenkov Remove visit_expr_post from ast Visitor `visit_expr_post` is only present in the immutable version of ast Visitors and its default implementation is a noop. Given that its only implementer is on `rustc_lint/src/early.rs` and its name follows the same naming convention as some other lints (`_post`), it seems that `visit_expr_post` being in `Visitor` was a little mistake. r? `@petrochenkov` related to rust-lang#128974
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
visit_expr_postis only present in the immutable version of ast Visitors and its default implementation is a noop.Given that its only implementer is on
rustc_lint/src/early.rsand its name follows the same naming convention as some other lints (_post), it seems thatvisit_expr_postbeing inVisitorwas a little mistake.r? @petrochenkov
related to #128974 & #127615