Skip to content

Reduce size of ImportData#155167

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
mejrs:box_directive
Apr 12, 2026
Merged

Reduce size of ImportData#155167
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
mejrs:box_directive

Conversation

@mejrs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mejrs mejrs commented Apr 11, 2026

Perhaps this will undo the regression caused by #152901

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 11, 2026
@fmease
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

fmease commented Apr 11, 2026

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 11, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 11, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: f64c22d (f64c22d98d6f2b7ecba8d8bb08cb8be885331545, parent: bf4fbfb7a18d74e7cd8eef93af7329c58fbb5344)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f64c22d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.1%, secondary -0.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.7% [5.7%, 5.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-6.2% [-6.2%, -6.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.1% [-1.1%, -1.1%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary -8.2%, secondary -2.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-8.2% [-8.8%, -7.5%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.5% [-3.1%, -1.7%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -8.2% [-8.8%, -7.5%] 2

Binary size

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.0% [-0.0%, -0.0%] 4
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.0% [-0.1%, -0.0%] 13
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.0% [-0.0%, -0.0%] 4

Bootstrap: 490.796s -> 491.012s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 394.14 MiB -> 394.09 MiB (-0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 11, 2026
@mejrs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mejrs commented Apr 11, 2026

Thanks for starting the perf run. That looks like most of what was lost.

FWIW I've opened #155174 which (unlike #155155) never checks features on the happy path. I don't think it is measurable but I guess we could do a perf run on that as well if you wish.

@mejrs mejrs marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2026 23:56
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 11, 2026
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Apr 11, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 11, 2026

r? @jackh726

rustbot has assigned @jackh726.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
  • compiler expanded to 69 candidates
  • Random selection from 11 candidates

@Kivooeo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Kivooeo commented Apr 12, 2026

r? me @bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 12, 2026

📌 Commit c4e4156 has been approved by Kivooeo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Apr 12, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors bot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 12, 2026
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2026
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #155084 (Initial functions to start on transmute v2)
 - #155126 (add `cfg(target_object_format = "...")`)
 - #155165 (Portable SIMD subtree update)
 - #153871 (fix spurious test failure in `metadata_access_times`)
 - #155150 (replace <name> @ ty::AliasTy matches with just using args: <name>_args)
 - #155159 (Fix min-specialization ICE from ignored region resolution failure)
 - #155167 (Reduce size of `ImportData`)
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 040b6db into rust-lang:main Apr 12, 2026
12 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2026
Rollup merge of #155167 - mejrs:box_directive, r=Kivooeo

Reduce size of `ImportData`

Perhaps this will undo the regression caused by #152901
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.97.0 milestone Apr 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants