debuginfo: Make variables captured in unboxed closures available in debuginfo.#19363
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Nov 28, 2014
Merged
Conversation
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2014
…, r=alexcrichton This PR lets `rustc` generate debuginfo for variables captured by unboxed closures. Fixes #19356 @nikomatsakis This PR will probably conflict with #19338. If this gets merged before, you should be able to just leave the test case as it is (maybe remove the `#![feature(unboxed_closures)]` directive).
lnicola
pushed a commit
to lnicola/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
display varargs in completion detail
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR lets
rustcgenerate debuginfo for variables captured by unboxed closures.Fixes #19356
@nikomatsakis This PR will probably conflict with #19338. If this gets merged before, you should be able to just leave the test case as it is (maybe remove the
#![feature(unboxed_closures)]directive).