New blog location

I moved my blog to WordPress.

New location is here https://kimmoir.blog/

Read more...

Eclipse Committer Emeritus

I received this very kind email in my inbox this morning.

"David Williams has expired your commit rights to the
eclipse.platform.releng project.  The reason for this change is:

We have all known this day would come, but it does not make it any easier.
It has taken me four years to accept that Kim is no longer helping us with
Eclipse. That is how large her impact was, both on myself and Eclipse as a
whole. And that is just the beginning of why I am designating her as
"Committer Emeritus". Without her, I humbly suggest that Eclipse would not
have gone very far. Git shows her active from 2003 to 2012 -- longer than
most! She is (still!) user number one on the build machine. (In Unix terms,
that is UID 500). The original admin, when "Eclipse" was just the Eclipse
Project.

She was not only dedicated to her job as a release engineer she was
passionate about doing all she could to make other committer's jobs easier
so they could focus on their code and specialties. She did (and still does)
know that release engineering is a field of its own; a specialized
profession (not something to "tack on" at the end) that just anyone can do)
 and good, committed release engineers are critical to the success of any
project.

For anyone reading this that did not know Kim, it is not too late: you can
follow her blog at

http://relengofthenerds.blogspot.com/

You will see that she is still passionate about release engineering and
influential in her field.

And, besides all that, she was (I assume still is :) a well-rounded, nice
person, that was easy to work with! (Well, except she likes running for
exercise. :)

Thanks, Kim, for all that you gave to Eclipse and my personal thanks for
all that you taught me over the years (and I mean before I even tried to
fill your shoes in the Platform).

We all appreciate your enormous contribution to the success of Eclipse and
happy to see your successes continuing.

To honor your contributions to the project, David Williams has nominated
you for Committer Emeritus status."


Thank you David! I really appreciate your kind words.  I learned so much working with everyone in the Eclipse community.  I had the intention to contribute to Eclipse when I left IBM but really felt that I have given all I had to give.  Few people have the chance to contribute to two fantastic open source communities during their career.  I'm lucky to have that opportunity.

My IBM friends made this neat Eclipse poster when I left.  The Mozilla dino displays my IRC handle.

Read more...

Thoughts on being a second generation geek

When I was in Toronto for our last work week,  I mentioned to one of my colleagues that I was a second generation geek.  He replied something to the effect of "There are families that have been fishing lobster for eight generations but not many second generation geeks."

I'm a second generation geek thanks to the influence of my Dad.  My sister also works in the software industry, as a technical writer.   My parents both had a tremendous influence on us.  If it wasn't for their support and encouragement, I doubt that we would be where we are today.

My Dad's first technology job was working at Burroughs  in Vancouver, BC as a field service technician and manager.  He would travel to customer sites to fix their computers, usually at banks,  insurance companies or government.  Back then computers were very large, not very common, and they had a longer lifecycle than we see today.  He had a briefcase full of tools to fix them,  given that most problems were mechanical or electrical in nature, as opposed to software.

About a decade later,  our family moved across the country and he started working as a technical services manager at a small software and services firm in Halifax, NS. This was the dawn of the PC era, and he brought home a succession of computers for him to learn about, as well as the rest of our family.  Dad would bring home stacks of computer magazines and manuals to read at nights on weekends, which I started to read as well.  We had many spirited discussions about technology, and what the future would hold.

In addition to having a wealth of technical knowledge, my Dad is also an accomplished woodworker  and builds beautiful furniture.  He bought my sister and I hammers so we could work along with him in the workshop.  There was also an abundance of Lego,  his old Meccano kit,  and stacks of science fiction books.  Christmas meant the inevitable gifts of conference swag in stockings, or a Linux book under the tree. 

Over the years, I have returned the favour and given my parents a lot of the swag I've received at work.  I'm sure they have the finest collection of Eclipse wear in Nova Scotia.  But this year begins a new tradition.

My Dad loves Firefox too

I've noticed that many of my (female) friends who work in software had a parent who worked in the industry and thus were a source of influence for their choice in career.  I learned from both my parents was to work very hard.  From my Dad, I learned that
1) Change in this industry is constant and it makes things interesting.
2) Continuous learning is essential.  Take courses, read voraciously,  break things and fix them.
3) STEM careers are for women.

Thanks Dad!

This past weekend, I asked him if there were ever any women at tech conferences when he attended them in the 1980s or 90s.  He replied that there was usually one or two, but that was all.

He then proceeded to tell me a story about a technical sales manager who he worked with for many years named Eli.  She had worked in an administrative capacity at Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), but wanted to become a salesperson.  She was told that there was absolutely no way that she could be become a salesperson and represent DEC to customers because she was a woman.

In those days, computers were sold from OEMs (original equipment manufacturers like DEC) or VARs (valued added resellers).  The company where my Dad worked at was a VAR and had agreements with various OEMs, including DEC.  They would package hardware and software from several companies, along with installation and support services into sales proposals to meet customer requirements.  The funny thing was that VARs and OEMs would often compete for the same customers since they both sold the same branded hardware.  The VARs weren't limited to selling to a single vendor, but the OEMs had more flexibility in pricing in margins since they were the manufacturer.   Sales margins on hardware were quite high compared to what they are today, and thus a job as a salesperson could be quite financially lucrative if you were good.

Eli left DEC to work as a sales manager at the same office where my Dad worked.  She proceeded to outsell all the salesmen at her her previous employer who had refused to let her be a salesperson because of her gender, and won many sales awards.  So awesome!

I was always was a bit intimidated by Eli.  She was tough as nails, with a wicked sense of humour.  I can imagine that it wasn't always an easy path she had to walk, given that being a professional woman and working in technology was not common at the time, especially is socially conservative Nova Scotia.  But she did it, and proved that she could rise above her detractors.

A second thanks to women who have blazed trails in the past :-)  Who inspired you to choose your career in STEM?

Read more...

New platform tests: OS X Mountain Lion

Late Monday night, we moved a new testing platform into production.  We have 80+ shiny new Mountain Lion slaves running tests for desktop builds, with several reserved for staging tests.  There are a few issues with failing tests that are being tracked in bug 786084.

Image ©ekai,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/ekai/457004988/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

This was one of the larger projects I've worked on since I started at Mozilla a few months ago.  Many of the existing test and builds slaves that we run are configured with an old installation of Puppet (0.24.8) that we call "pre-historic puppet".  We have a newer installation of Puppet running 2.7.19 nicknamed PuppetAgain that serves as the Puppet Master for these new Mountain Lion slaves.   The PuppetAgain installation used to just support CentOS slaves, so we added modules to support the Mac slaves and accommodate all the quirky Apple specific configuration needs.   
 
Given my experience as an Eclipse committer, I installed the Geppetto project as my Puppet manifest editor and it's a great tool.  Thanks to the folks at Cloudsmith for developing it, it has been very useful. 

In addition to becoming familiar with Puppet, I also had the opportunity to learn about the releng buildbot configs, adding new buildbot masters, updating graphing databases to store Talos results, running staging tests and all the steps to add a new platform. Since the process wasn't documented, I wrote up some notes to help others if they need to do the same.

Thanks to everyone on the release engineering and release engineering operations teams for all their help, especially answering my many questions and reviewing patches.  Its great to see something that you worked on in production, and finally generating green builds.

Read more...

Learning to speak like a native Mozillian

Aside from gaining experience with the technical requirements of a new job, there's also the challenge of learning the terms within the community as well as cultural norms.  There's time spent finding the right code repositories, documentation and test servers.  Who's the right person to cc on a bug or ping in IRC?  When learning a foreign language, they say that if you're still translating in your head before you speak,  you're still learning.  Here are some terms and conventions I learned during my first weeks at Mozilla. 

Release some code to a production branch or stream on the canonical repo
Mozilla:  to land
Eclipse:  to release or commit

People
Mozilla: Lots of people named John, Chris and Mike, many Canadians
Eclipse:  Lots of people named John, Chris and Mike, Canadians represent too

Image ©meddygarnet, http://www.flickr.com/photos/blakespot/5240888169/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0 

Where bugs rain down from
Mozilla: https://bugs.mozilla.org
Eclipse: https://bugs.eclipse.org

The source of all truth, which may contradict itself
Mozilla: http://wiki.mozilla.org
Eclipse:  http://wiki.eclipse.org

The version control system(s) to alternately love and shake your fist at
Mozilla: Hg with some Git, Subversion, CVS and Bazaar
Eclipse:  Git with a side order of CVS and Subversion.  (Side orders will be deprecated soon)

Image ©clsung, http://www.flickr.com/photos/clsung/310886130/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

Colloquial expression for the associated open source foundation
Mozilla: MoFo
Eclipse: the foundation

Time for liquid refreshment
Mozilla: MFBT
Eclipse: Beer o'clock

Image ©Cambridge Brewing Company , http://www.flickr.com/photos/cambridgebrewingcompany/5619040409/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

Communication channels in order of importance
Mozilla: IRC,  mailing lists, Bugzilla
Eclipse: Bugzilla, mailing lists, Twitter, IRC

Image ©blakespot, http://www.flickr.com/photos/blakespot/5240888169/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

Code review
Mozilla: review flag in Bugzilla for all patches
Eclipse:  review flag in Bugzilla at the end of the release cycle, others use Gerrit all the time

Incredibly smart and friendly people with a passion for delivering fantastic open source software
 +1 Mozilla and Eclipse

What have I missed?

Disclaimer: This is just based on my own personal experience.  YMMV.

Read more...

Challenges in Release Engineering

I've been at Mozilla since the end of April.  The learning curve is steep but I'm having fun climbing.  My coworkers are very friendly and helpful while answering my barrage of questions with respect to how things work.   One of the things I've noticed is that there are many common challenges in release engineering, no matter what you're building. Here's my list so far:

1. Signing builds is like a falafel sandwich.  (Always includes some pita).

Image ©chotda, http://www.flickr.com/photos/santos/3531853459/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

2.  Scaling your build to manage infrastructure utilization, tooling to manage that infrastructure and optimizing build parallelization is extremely challenging.  Developers will consume all available build infrastructure and then ask for more.  Scaling build infrastructure to accommodate future growth is an ongoing process. 

3. Proliferating numbers of platforms on which to build, test and run performance metrics add complexity.

 Image ©misterbisson, http://www.flickr.com/photos/maisonbisson/109211670/sizes/o/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0 

4.  Update game adventures.  When you have an open platform that included the installation of third-party components, it's inevitable that you will encounter unexpected update cases in the wild that weren't reflected in test cases.

5. Frequent releases generate faster user feedback on new features.  However, additional releases are expensive for the release engineering, quality assurance and release management teams.  Each additional release eats time, both people and machine.  Making the community aware that builds are not free is an ongoing communication exercise.

Image ©aarongeller, http://www.flickr.com/photos/aarongeller/360135019/  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

6.  You can have great documentation and process but the accumulated technical and tribal knowledge required to resolve a complex and broken build quickly is not earned by anything other than experience.

  Image ©Ian Muttoo, http://www.flickr.com/photos/imuttoo/2631466945/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0 

7.  If you can compile your code, this doesn't mean there won't be issues with packaging, signing and testing it.  Making a build available in a format for millions of users to consume > code that compiles.  Education is needed to make people aware of this distinction. 

What release engineering challenges do you face?

Read more...

Moving to Mozilla

Eclipse family: March 23 will be my last day at IBM. I'm happy to announce that I'll be joining the Mozilla Release Engineering team in April. 

Image ©flod, http://www.flickr.com/photos/flod/2221300134/sizes/l/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

We all wear many hats during our lives.  I've always been fiercely proud of the privilege of calling myself an Eclipse committer.  We've accomplished amazing things together.  I look forward to seeing the continued growth and success of the Eclipse community. 

At Mozilla, I'll have the opportunity to work with a completely new software stack, and learn many new skills while working with very talented people. Best of all, my job will involve contributing to an open source community.  This is what I love to do.  The Mozilla goals of making the web better, and teaching a new generation to make content, instead of just consuming it, really resonate with me. Running builds on 1200+ machines raises some interesting scalability issues which I'm eager to learn more about.  It will be challenging work, and I'm honoured to have the opportunity to work at Mozilla.  I'll be working from my home in Ottawa. 

Where there are new challenges ahead for me, at the same time it has been a difficult decision to let my contribution to Eclipse wane.  I'd like to continue contribute to Eclipse in some way but on a part-time or occasional basis.

My IBM colleagues, my fellow committers and the Eclipse foundation staff:  you are all extraordinary.  It has been a privilege to work with you and learn so much.  To those in the larger Eclipse community, you inspire me.  To the people on the Eclipse SDK and Equinox teams, I have never had the opportunity to work with such a wonderful group of people.  Not only are you creative and technically brilliant, but you are all so dedicated to doing the right thing and getting things done.   You're all genuinely nice people, without ego, who are eager to share your knowledge with others.   It's not often that software project ships on time every year for ten years and continues to delight its user community.  It is a testament to the team behind it that this continues to be the case.  

In the process of working on Eclipse, I've met some fantastic people, many who have become great friends.  I'll miss the seeing your faces every day and discussing the finer points of Git migration strategies, but I'll still be on IRC, Twitter, Linkedln, G+ etc.  If you live in the Ottawa area, I'm always up for lunch :-) 

It has been a great run. Thank you all

Note #1:  I'll continue to write on this blog. The name still applies :-)
Note #2: I was going to call this post "Firefox-y Lady".  Then I read the lyrics to the Hendrix song "Foxy Lady" and decided maybe not.

Read more...

2011 by the numbers

2011 was an exciting year in the Eclipse community.  From my corner of the Eclipse universe, he's what it looked like:


One book chapter, many thanks

I contributed a chapter on Eclipse to the Architecture of Open Source Applications in 2010 and the book was published in May 2011.  Thanks to Amy Brown and Greg Wilson, for their long hours editing and providing feedback to the authors of this book.  It's a great read!  When Greg first approached me about writing this chapter, my immediate thought was "How hard could it be? I live and breathe Eclipse all day".  It was much more difficult that I imagined but in the process I learned a tremendous amount and am a better committer for the experience.  Many thanks to DJ Houghton and John Arthorne for reviewing my drafts and providing valuable feedback. A special thanks to Jeff McAffer who I interviewed about the decision to switch to OSGi in 3.0 and Steve Northover for his suggestions to make the SWT section into something more pixel perfect.  Merci Olivier Thomann for answering my many compiler questions,  and Boris Bokowski and Paul Webster for their thorough discussions with me regarding the modelled workbench and dependency injection in 4.x.  Also, thanks to Mike Wilson to allow me the flexibility in my job to spend some time at work working on this chapter.  I'm excited to see that Amy and Greg are now editing a second volume of this book.

Six milestones, many release candidates, two service releases, and one coordinated release, four streams, thousands of builds, millions of tests
No rest for the committers.

143 bug fixes
I closed about 143 bugs in the releng bucket in the past year.  That doesn't seem like much really.  I'd have liked to solve more.  The largest issues implemented from a releng perspective were shared licenses, code coverage, and the largest work item, the Git migration.

42 Git repos 
The Equinox and Eclipse projects migrated all their repos to Git.  We now have about 42 Git repos.  This involved a tremendous amount of work on the part of the Eclipse team as a whole.  There were many whiteboard drawings and detailed discussions about the migration process with John, Paul and a Mr. Gheorghe.  There was no Ringo.  Thank you Paul for all the huge amount of testing, script writing, and migration of all the ui and e4 repos. Thanks John for your work many sage suggestions on our Git migration, as well as your suggestion to implement the git flow method to simplify our development and build processes.  Thanks Andrew Niefer for migrating many of the Equinox and PDE repos, Bogdan Gheorghe for your work with SWT, and Oliver Thomann for testing JDT Core repos.  Thanks Tom Watson for your Git advice, having already climbed the Git learning curve while working on the OSGi Alliance repositories.  To Dani Megert and Markus Keller, your always fine attention to detail and pointing out areas that could be improved is appreciated. Paul is giving a talk about our migration at EclipseCon 2012 called Let's Git this Party Started.  I'm sure it will be insightful and entertaining.

One EclipseCon, two talks, one castle, many great people
I was privileged to attend EclipseCon Europe in Ludwidsberg this past November and present two talks.  I thoroughly enjoyed preparing these talks, and even more presenting them.  On the Wednesday morning, I talked about our Git Migration, and that evening I gave a talk with John Kellerman about history of Eclipse over the past 10 years.  After the second talk, a few people came up to me and said that the talk was so good that it should have been a keynote.  That was very fantastic to hear because we really put a huge amount of effort into that presentation.  I also had a lot of fun talking to people at our booth where we had posted many pictures of the Eclipse family from over the years. The Saturday after the conference Simon Kaegi, Eric Moffatt and I visited Heidelberg castle.  Canada scores very low on the castle index so this was a treat.   

You can't buy Eclipse magazines or giant pretzels at train stations in Canada either. I was impressed.

19 blog posts
I didn't have much time to write blogs posts this year.  The most popular one I wrote this year was about smashing open source stereotypes.

I'm never sure how popular a blog post will when I write them. It's always a surprise.  The comparison of Mozilla and Eclipse build infrastructure I wrote last year still holds the record for most popular (it ended up on reddit).


One marathon, many kilometers of training
How is running related to release engineering?  Running keeps me sane when release engineering gets crazy :-)  Preparing for the Ottawa marathon in May means that you have to start training at the end of January.  Running through snow, ice, wind and rain teaches you there isn't really anything you can't do when you are willing put in a lot of hard work to reach your goal.  And when you reach that goal, there's a lot of joy, because you know that you have conquered all the obstacles in your path and emerged victorious.

My sneakers after a 19K training run through deep slush

Open source is really a huge team effort and I had a lot of fun in the Eclipse community in 2011.

Who knows what 2012 will bring?

Read more...

We're the face of open source

I had some interesting discussions on Twitter this afternoon.  

Wayne replied:

Miles said:

One of the great things about the Eclipse community: that we cooperate on open source projects yet compete on commercial products.  This slide from the Eclipse 10 years talk  that John Kellerman and I  recently gave shows the diversity of the CDT project by company.

Here's another slide where we talked about the fact that there weren't originally enough non-IBM committers on the Eclipse project.  I called this "Too much blue in the Eclipse rainbow".

Image ©darrentunnicliff, http://www.flickr.com/photos/darrentunnicliff/4510834607/  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

I'd like see a more diverse community at Eclipse and in open source in general.  To spread the word that it's a rewarding career and we have a wonderful community.  Also, I'd like to find more people to fix bugs :-)

Occupy Open Source: We are the 1%

I don't know if the percentage of women at Eclipse is really 1% but it's pretty low.*

Ian later tweeted

My response was that it would be interesting to focus on the person, where they had come from and what they work and work the technology into the discussion.  Show a picture of the person, what their educational background is, how they got involved in open source, and what they work on.  I think computer science and open source have an image problem.  People think that we software isn't a social endeavour.  And yet it is.  Hello GitHub.  That the work we do doesn't change the world and make people's lives better.  No again.

One of the ways to combat stereotypes tell stories from the perspective of the person. How they came to work in open source. The interesting projects they work on.  Talks they presented at conferences.  What they do in their spare time outside work. Curtis writes code for PDE but he also likes to kayak.  Susan works on Orion but also runs an organic farm.  Andrew writes Linux tools but he also has interesting travel adventures.  Eric works on the next generation Eclipse UI and wins pool tournaments.  Tom works on that too, and he likes to ski and hike near his home in Innsbruck.  Ian lives in Victoria, works on p2 and plays hockey.  Introduce the person, then move on to talk about the technology they work on :-)

Yesterday, Syzmon asked me if me if could use our Eclipse 10 Years talk at a demo camp in Poland. I thought that was fantastic.  Our talk delivered in another country, in a different language.  Go Creative Commons.

Putting these too ideas together, I thought it would be interesting to have a common slide deck we as a community could use at schools or universities called "We're the face of open source".  I think it's important to showcase the different paths people take to get to their careers.  And kids need to to see something of themselves reflected in people who work in the industry.  It doesn't matter if you're a man or woman, your ethnicity,  where you live, if you're gay or straight, have five kids or three dogs. The important thing is that you have a story that you want to share to inspire a new generation to consider contributing to open source. 

Thoughts?

Notes
*1)This is not intended to be a statement for or against the Occupy movement.  I'm just trying to be funny. YMMV.
2) Standing out in the Crowd talk from OSCON 2009 has interesting numbers about open source diversity and the benefits it brings
3) I'm willing to help put the slide deck together in my spare time outside work.  We could use a Google Docs to allow multiple people to edit it. Maybe the slide deck could provide a list of Eclipse mentors that are willing to help out students fix their first bug, browse the source tree etc.  These are details.  Let me know if you are interested in contributing :-) 
4) This would make an interesting EclipseCon talk. Ten Eclipse committers/contributors you should know and why

Read more...

EclipseCon Europe presentations now available

My presentations from EclipseCon Europe are now available on slideshare.

The first one is the story of the Eclipse and Equinox team's migration from CVS to Git.

Migrating to Git: Rethinking the Commit

View more presentations from Kim Moir

There were a lot of great presentations on  Git migrations such as those by Steffen Pingel and Christian Campo.  One thing that I've learned is that the time to migrate is proportional to the size of your code base and history.  Someone asked me if we considered just starting in Git without our history. Well, no, but that would have solved a lot of problems. It was also interesting to talk to the EGit team, and meet some of the people working at GitHub. (Thanks for the octocat stickers Kevin!). In honour of Movember, this slide seems appropriate.

Image ©dealingwith, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dealingwith/4295488113/  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

The second talk I co-presented with John Kellerman. It's a look back at the last ten years of Eclipse history. I had several people come up to me after the talk and say they really enjoyed it. Thanks! It was fun to look back at Eclipse history and dig up funny pictures and bugs. I enjoyed presenting with John because he talked about the business side and I talked about the evolution of the Eclipse community from a down in the trenches commmiter perspective. A good balance. He has been involved in the Eclipse community since well before my time, lots of great stories!

Has it really been 10 years?

View more presentations from Kim Moir

You can also listen to the talk on FOSSLC website.  I love the fact that all the EclipseCon presentations were recorded. I plan to go back to and watch the sessions I missed!

A big thank you to the organizers of EclipseCon Europe for a fantastic conference. I've never attended one before, and was very impressed. Beautiful location, interesting talks, great running paths nearby and of course, the best people. It's great to be able to spend time with people who you work with but never get to see in person, like Ian Bull and Andrew Overholt. It was also great to meet new people at lunch and in the hallways.  I talked to some first time EclipseCon attendees who were very impressed with the caliber of talks at the conference so kudos to everyone who presented.

At the IBM booth, we pinned up many pictures of the Eclipse family over the past ten years. It was great to talk to people who visited the booth, especially those new the the Eclipse community.  I posted a link to them on my Google+ account. Looking back at them it's amazing to see so many smiling people.


It's hard to believe that it's been ten years. I had a number of people come up to me at the conference and say that they couldn't believe that I had been involved in the community for ten years. Well, I can't believe it either. It reminded me of the moment when I stood up on stage to receive my university diploma and I thought, how could these four years have gone so quickly?  I don't know but it's been a lot of fun.  By the way, here is a list of other committers who have been involved with Eclipse for ten years or more.

More importantly, there are now over a thousand Eclipse committers today.  I'm honoured to work with you all :-)

Presentations on slideshare:
Migrating to Git: Rethinking the Commit
Slideshare: Has it really been 10 years?
FOSSLC recording: Has it really been 10 years?
If you look at the speakers notes, you can see the text of the talk.  Most of the slides are just pictures in "Presentation Zen" style.

Read more...

In open source, all you have is social capital

Over a month ago, I watched this keynote by David Eaves that he gave at DjangoCon. Yes, I'm way behind on the list of things I'd like to blog about. I blame Bugzilla :-) Also, quite a few people at EclipseCon Europe came up to me and mentioned that they really enjoyed reading my blog. Thanks - I enjoy writing!



David Eaves is a negotiation consultant. He helps people on opposite sides of an issue come to an agreement, and has clients in open data, government, industry, and open source communities. He has done work at Mozilla to help manage contributor engagement and implement measures to keep contributors working in the community.

He starts off by telling the story, that as part of of his work with Mozilla, he thinks that he should submit a bug. He submits his first Thunderbird bug and announces on Twitter or Facebook that he's excited to submit his first bug. To which he gets the reply "I bet it's a duplicate".  According to this presentation, 50% of all bugs are duplicates.  It may be a duplicate, but this response isn't the best approach to encouraging future participation from a new contributor.

He then says that most open source communities don't have financial capital.  They don't have money flowing in to influence people.  "All you have is social capital".  Social capital consists of the people that contribute to your community and make it successful.  In theory, in a corporation, human resources tracks how to retain and manage its people.  In open source, we spend very little time managing our social capital or even better, tracking  it.

He then continues that one of the mantras of open source is that it's a meritocracy and your coding skills are the key to success within the community.  But if you look at people who have spent a lot of time in an open source community and are considered leaders,  many of them spend a lot more time working with people and  managing their community as opposed to coding.  To which he says "We pull people in based on their coding skills, and we promote people based on their negotiation skills".  Also, he remarks that nobody tells us that, and that we all stress that technical skills trumpet negotiation skills despite the evidence to the contrary.

He then gives examples of funny or misunderstood Mozilla bugs.  He states how it's harder to communicate with people when only via the written word.  I find that myself.  I've met quite a few people at conferences who I've found to be rude in Bugzilla to only find that in person they seem like a totally different person.  Reasonable.  Friendly.  Helpful.  Anyways, since Bugzilla is a written medium he suggests that the best way to interact on it is to ask questions.  He states that often people just have a solution in mind as a bug fix and aggressively push their solution where in fact they should ask the user what they want to do in the first place.  Also, you should paraphrase and repeat what the user said to gain understanding, acknowledge the problem and advocate for a solution. All great advice!

The next section of the talk discusses the architecture of a community.  Fork used to be a four letter word in open source  But with the advent of GitHub, it's not, but rather a way to empower the user.  It also absolves you from seeking anyone's permission before contributing.  He says we need to design our communities to "Architect for cooperation and away from collaboration"  It's great if a new contributor can start fixing a problem without the transaction costs associated with interacting with a committer.  We can spend our time on other tasks.  He also states that we need to empower the lowest people on the stack, such as those triaging bugs.  He also remarks that immediately marking a bug as invalid without acknowledgement of the effort required to report it doesn't build community loyalty.

GitHub Octocat

Image ©sunfox, http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunfox/4365495446/  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0

The final section of the talk described applying metrics to the show what is going on in a project.  To measure contributor patches from non-paid staff is a way to measure social capital.  To determine why people have stopped contributing.  To measure wait time for before a patch is submitted.  He also states that it would be interesting to have a repository API and once you attach a patch to a bug, it would update the bug with the anticipated  wait time, to set expectations for the reporter.  He states that Wikipedia segments users based on metrics and they applies actions, such as suggesting mentors for new contributors.

I think having metrics for new Eclipse contributors would be very interesting.  I rarely have people contributing patches to my bucket other than from other Eclipse or Equinox project committers, but I'm sure the metrics would be very interesting for other components.   It would also be valuable to determine the reason that people stop contributing, and implement measures to encourage people to continue to their involvement.

He finishes by stating that there needs to be a social infrastructure for the community, not just code.  Also, in some cases, you many need to remove people from the community to reduce negative social capital.  A great talk, I highly recommend  it - extremely informative and funny. 


Notes:
 
David Eaves also blogs at http://www.eaves.ca on open data, open source and other interesting topics.
His keynote is here http://blip.tv/djangocon/keynote-david-eaves-5571777

Read more...

Excited about EclipseCon Europe

Ten years ago, we were burning the midnight oil getting Eclipse 1.0 ready to release.  I offer you proof

Me stuck behind server rack. Yes, I'm wearing COWS shirt.  Please don't judge me.

Today, we're working hard to polish our presentations as we celebrate ten years of  Eclipse at EclipseCon Europe.  I'm excited to have the opportunity to attend EclipseCon Europe, this will be my first time :-) 

I've been preparing two presentations over the past few weeks.  The first one is called Migrating to Git: Rethinking the Commit.  Here, I'll talk about the process we used to convert our large and historic CVS reposository to Git, the problems we encountered, how our development processes changed, and what advice we can offer other teams that are contemplating this migration.

Image ©venegas, http://www.flickr.com/photos/venegas/5549123/ licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Image ©spool32, http://www.flickr.com/photos/spool32/5045502202/ licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) 



The second talk is a light-hearted look back at the past ten years.  I received an email from EclipseCon Europe this morning that stated.  "After the Stammtisch, a couple of long-time Eclipse enthusiasts present Has it Really Been 10 Years?."  Long-time enthusiasts?  Okay, that made me feel old.  Anyways, in this talk John Kellerman and I look back at the the last ten years and discuss what what we expected when Eclipse was released as open source, the response we received, what mistakes were made, what surprised us.  Fair warning: I have uncovered some embarrassing pictures from our past Eclipse family.  I'll be using this occasion to showcase them.  If you have any interesting pictures to share, email me and I'd be happy to include them :-)   My understanding is that a Stammtisch involves beer so I think people will be in the right mood when they walk into the talk.

Last but not least, I invite you for to go for a run or walk each morning at 7am.  We'll meet in the lobby of the Nestor hotel.  Sign up for EclipseCon exercise here! 

See you soon!

Read more...

A history of lizard wrangling and other software stories

I've been thinking a lot lately about open source history.  I'm in the midst of preparing material for a presentation that John Kellerman and I will be giving at EclipseCon Europe about the history of Eclipse. Last week an interesting video crossed my twitter feed.  It was a talk by Mitchell Baker on the history of Mozilla.  Mitchell is the Chair of the Mozilla Foundation and Mozilla Corporation and has been involved in this community for many years.  Her title is Chief Lizard Wrangler.  That's the best job title I have ever heard.  Well, being called an astronaut would be fun too but you get the idea.  According to Wikipedia, she's a also skilled trapeze artist.  I like learning about people with interesting hobbies.




In the video, she talks about the history of  Mozilla, which started in 1998. She describes the tension between Netscape the corporation and Mozilla the community.  For instance, the belief in the Mozilla community that commit rights should be earned and voted on by your peers, not just assigned based on your employer.  It's a really interesting to learn about the conflict in those early years at Mozilla and how they worked so hard with very few resources to be where they are today.

One of my favourite lines from the talk is that "Technology alone does not change people's lives.  Our opportunity in the browser is to have a product that touches people." Also, she states that the problem with a lot of open source projects is that they are irrelevant to the marketplace and don't treat their users very well.  For instance, calling a user stupid isn't going to make their life better.  "You need to make a product that is elegant and beautiful and powerful under the covers but that people love."  Mozilla has a bit of a different outlook that the Eclipse community because their flagship product Firebox is used by everyday consumers.  Eclipse components are consumed by developers in the form of open source packages that the coordinated release provides, but at the same time many people consume components in commercial products that build upon our open source offerings.

Some other memorable lines "UI is always the most contentious issue".  Well, at Eclipse we never argue about UI.  Wait....hmm..maybe...this bug has a few contentious comments.....

This talk really resonated with me.  Eclipse and Mozilla are two well known open source communities with different histories but ultimately both are very successful.  I highly recommend taking the time to listen to it.

Happy Ada Lovelace Day from Ottawa!

Read more...

Busting Build Myths

Who doesn't love Mythbusters? It must be great to wake up every morning and go to work in a fantastically equipped lab, build things and maybe set off a few explosions.  A dream job.

Unfortunately, my lab is filled with aging build machines, not cool toys.  When a build explodes I have to pick up the pieces and make it work again.  I've never been invited to the White House to talk science while sporting a snappy beret either.

Source Wikipedia: Washington Post blog, credit given to The White House/Chuck Kennedy, The White House/Chuck Kennedy

There are a few myths surrounding builds I'd like to bust.  I'll use the only tool I have available to dispel them, my keyboard:


1) My six bundle build is easy.  Thus your build is easy too.  There is a big difference between building a few bundles and building products, p2 repositories, API tests, tens of thousands of JUnit and performance tests for many platforms. Is running an Apache server in your basement the same as running Slashdot?  No. Builds are the same. Scalability issues and complexity.

2) Building with X will solve all your problems. Changing to a different build technology to compile and package your bundles can solve a lot of problems if it has been tested fully and works for all your requirements.  But there's a cost to migration.  To working out all the bugs and corner cases.  Is it worth the transition?  Only time will tell.  The more complex the build, the higher the cost of migration.  Yes, it would be wonderful if we could all run our builds the same way at Eclipse to help our consumers.  But this requires a considerable time investment to ensure that everything works.  As well, it means forgoing work in other areas to facilitate this transition. It's a tradeoff.

3) Once you get your build working, you never have to change it.  As my previous post described, build scripts evolve in concert with the code base. Constantly changing.  More code, more tests, more build gymnastics.  Building software is like owning a house.  You can try to to forgo all maintenance to save money, but your risk long term damage from broken pipes, a leaky roof or mice as the building deteriorates.

Homeowner forgot to visit Home Depot

Image ©graywolfx47, http://www.flickr.com/photos/graywolfx47/4308623603/sizes/z/in/photostream/licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)  

4) Nobody in needs to understand how the build works, they just need to push a button.  That's great. Until the day before a release when your build fails with a cryptic message about unresolved dependencies.  And you have no idea how to fix it.  And neither does anyone else on the team.

5)  Release engineers are unskilled monkeys.  On the weekend, I attended the Software Developer's Summit here in Ottawa.  Interesting conference and it was great to meet some new  people. In the afternoon,  there was a meeting to discuss the long term build support with Eclipse foundation staff and other interested parties.  The term "monkey" was used by several participants as a colloquial expression for a release engineer.  I don't think it meant to be a malicious expression but at the same time, I found it interesting.  Many developers have limited knowledge of how builds work, to them it's a big black box.  Monkeys.  Big black box. Hmmmm. This sounds familiar.

Let's pretend these apes are monkeys.

Source: Wikipedia. Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey

Since we release engineers understand how the black box works, maybe we're not the monkeys :-)

What other build myths are out there?

Read more...

Research, Release Engineering and ROI

I recently read some academic papers that quantify some release engineering practices in open source communities.  Very interesting.

The first one, "An Empirical Study of Build Maintenance Effort" (PDF), looks at how the time spent maintaining the build impacts the developers in a project.  It examines build coupling which refers to the how often changes in source code require changes in build code, as well as build ownership, which is the proportion of developers on the team who are responsible for maintaining the build.  The projects studied were ArgoUML, Hibernate, Eclipse (SDK), Jazz, GCC, Git, Linux, Mozilla, PLlot and PostgresSQL.

Here are some snippets I found interesting in this paper.  Note that when they refer to "Eclipse-core" they mean the Eclipse project's build. In this paragraph, they are talking about build coupling and how to reduce it

"In Eclipse-core, the coupling is reduced to 16% and in Jazz the observed coupling is a mere 4%.  Eclipse-core and Jazz both leverage the automated Eclipse Plugin Development Environment (PDE) build technology. ..... Since the developer must only maintain the high-level build.properties file (via the IDE), the daily build maintenance is reduced".

Thank you PDE family.  Dynamically generating Ant scripts at build time to compile and package our bundles makes us look good when compared with other open source projects.

"Other researches have found that the Linux build engineers have spent a considerable amount of time to make their build system as simple as possible for developers, as the expense of a very complex and hard to maintain core build system machinery. "

People always assume that writing software is hard, but for some reason building software should be easy. Build systems are complex beasts and obfuscating the complexity for the user is just as difficult as it might be when writing a full scale application. Writing good software is difficult, and so is constructing an elegant and effective build system.  It's just a different skill set.

 "Up to 79% of source code developers and 89% of test code developers are significantly impacted by build maintenance, yet investment in build experts can reduce the proportion of impacted developers by 22% of source code developers and 24% of test code developers."

So it looks like if you hire a release engineer and the productivity of your developers will increase.  You would buy a new machine to make the build faster, why not hire a fantastic release engineer and make the build better? The numbers indicate an great return on investment. 

Building complexity

Image ©algonquin_college, http://www.flickr.com/photos/algonquin_college/4971004199/in/photostream/ licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0)  


The second paper of is interest is entitled "The Evolution of Java Build Systems" (PDF). 

Again it looks at open source build systems that use either Ant (ArgoUML, Tomcat, JBoss, Eclipse-core) or Maven (Hibernate and Geronimo). The authors find that as the number of source lines of  code being built (SLOC)  is strongly correlated with the number of build lines of code (BLOC).

"Similar to Lehman's first law of software evolution, build system specifications tend to grow over time unless explicit effort is put into refactoring them."

and

"The Halstead complexity of a build system is highly correlated with the build system's size (BLOC), indicating the BLOC is a good approximation of build system complexity".

Lots of build code means increasing complexity.  If you are only building a few bundles, your build is easier to understand.  Makes sense. 

From their analysis, they concluded found that both Ant and Maven based builds evolved in similar fashion.

I like this sentence

"Despite the crucial role of build systems and their non-trivial maintenance effort, software engineering research rarely focuses in them".

I'd like to thank the authors for conducting this research and look forward to reading more in the future.  Build systems are complex systems and I welcome the efforts of these researchers to quantify way they can be improved. And it's extra special when they look at the projects that we work on every day!

References:
It will never work in theory
Queens University Software Analysis and Intelligence Lab

Read more...

Open source: She loves you, She loves you not

Working in an open source community is great, but there are also some disadvantages. From my admittedly narrow world view as a committer working in the Eclipse community as an employee of a large corporation, here are some of my observations.

Image ©emzee, http://www.flickr.com/photos/emzee/162362897/sizes/z/in/photostream/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0  



Things I love about working in open source

1. The people you meet are amazing and enthusiastic.   It's is a privilege to work with such a group of talented and thoughtful people.
2. Instead of non-disclosure agreements, we're free to talk about everything we work on.  Since everything is open, there are tremendous learning opportunities.  This inherent openness  means university researchers write papers about our work. Interesting!
3. Open source software is used by our consumers in unique ways.  When Jeff Norris gave his keynote at EclipseCon 2010 on how Eclipse was used to monitor robots on Mars, it was extraordinary to think that we as a community had contributed to something that was literally out of this world.  And when he said thanks to the committers during his talk, it was a very proud moment for us all.  There are many other examples of ways in which Eclipse is used to extend our knowledge of the world(s) around us.

Image ©owlbookdreams, http://www.flickr.com/photos/owlbookdreams/3721505610/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0  


Some things I don't love about working in open source

1. Many people complain but don't contribute. They consume the code we craft, complain about how its written, but are loathe to roll their sleeves up and write a useful patch.
2. We are constantly starved for resources, whether it be people, or new hardware.  There are too many bugs and not enough days :-)
3. My gender is an outlier in our community.

Ten years ago this week, I started working in at a small company called Object Technology International (OTI) as a system administrator.  I was asked by Jeff McAffer to install a server called dev.eclipse.org that would act as a CVS and bugzilla server for a project that they were going to open source called Eclipse.  I said something like "Open source, that's great.  Just like Linux".  To which Jeff replied along the lines of  "Well, I don't think it will be as popular as Linux, but we'll see what happens".  And the rest as they say, is history.

What do you love about working in open source?

Read more...

Kill Build: Vol. 1

Here are some of the ways I've seen a build killed during my years as an Eclipse committter.


1.  Lightning. Ottawa has tremendous thunderstorms in the summer.  What also happens during the early summer? Our coordinated release.  One summer, a transformer next to our office was hit by lightning.  Boom.  No power for about 12 hours. Bye bye build.

Image © ViaMoi, http://www.flickr.com/photos/viamoi/3338093351/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0  

2.  Ice.  The air conditioner in our lab filled with ice and ceased to function. The machines in our build lab then overheated and shut down.

3.  Flood: Our lab's air conditioner leaked the resulting water and flooded the lab. The build was relegated to a watery grave.

Image © thirsk, http://www.flickr.com/photos/thirsk/840616475/ licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0   

4. Random loss of power.  A committer plugged in a space heater in her office which tripped a circuit breaker and killed the power in our build lab. Or the total and intermittent loss of power from the Ottawa Hydro.  In the end, the results is the same: a dead build.

Image © ViaMoi, http://www.flickr.com/photos/viamoi/3339707547  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0   


5.  Hardware self-destruction.  The eclipse foundation's power supply for a disk array sparked and brought down the switching gear. Dying switches, UPS's and drives have also wrought havoc.

6.  Permission issues: Permissions problems on the filesystem caused committing to the repository to fail. Or the signing process to time out.  Or both.

7. Network timeouts aka no network love.

Image © zoso_tc, http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoso_tc/3024964999/  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0    

8. Human Error: The usual suspects compile errors, uncoordinated changes across projects, problems in builder itself, corrupted jars etc. have sent many builds to an early death.

9. Upgrades invoke the unexpected.  Changing a ssl certificate unleashed shenanigans.  An simple upgrade of a test machine caused failures.

Image © waferboard, http://www.flickr.com/photos/waferboard/5321533361/  licensed under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 2.0    


10.  Not respecting resource constraints.  Consuming all the disk space, CPU, and bandwidth available is a fine way to finish off a build.

How your builds failed?  Any exciting ways I've missed?

Read more...