Skip to content

Translate jsx-in-depth to pt-BR - #105

Merged
jhonmike merged 6 commits into
reactjs:masterfrom
murtinha:translate-jsx-in-depth
Mar 9, 2019
Merged

jhonmike merged 6 commits into
reactjs:masterfrom
murtinha:translate-jsx-in-depth

Conversation

@murtinha

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

References issue number #1

@halian-vilela halian-vilela added the needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed label Feb 18, 2019
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated

@michellocana michellocana left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adicionei vΓ‘rias sugestΓ΅es, mas sem problemas, a maioria delas sΓ£o somente erros ortogrΓ‘ficos πŸ˜„

Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
@halian-vilela halian-vilela added question Further information is requested needs author response Changes requested needing author's input and removed needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed labels Feb 18, 2019
@halian-vilela

halian-vilela commented Feb 18, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@negreirosleo @michellocana @murtinha

Pessoal, obrigado pelo review!

Percebi um certo impasse ali em relaΓ§Γ£o Γ  traduΓ§Γ£o de "syntactic sugar"

Em alguns lugares ficou "aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico" e em outros a expressΓ£o foi totalmente removida e substituΓ­da por "atalho".

Creio que como estamos sempre considerando a possibilidade do usuΓ‘rio ler a documentaΓ§Γ£o oficial e se informar o suficiente para ler em outras fontes, eu particularmente nΓ£o acho que seja uma boa remover completamente a expressΓ£o. EntΓ£o a versΓ£o do "atalho" nΓ£o seria adequada.

Como a expressΓ£o em portuguΓͺs (aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico), apesar de feia, jΓ‘ tem inclusive verbete na Wikipedia, crio que podemos utilizΓ‘-la juntamente com a expressΓ£o original entre parΓͺnteses, apenas para fins de searchability.

O que acham entΓ£o de decidirmos sobre - aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico (syntactic sugar) para a traduΓ§Γ£o oficial?

Me digam o que acham q subo uma PR pro GlossΓ‘rio.

@michellocana

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

NΓ£o sabia que "aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico" era uma traduΓ§Γ£o reconhecida e jΓ‘ estava na Wikipedia, sendo assim acho que podemos usΓ‘-la sim

@negreirosleo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@halian-vilela eu acho vΓ‘lido aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico (syntactic sugar), jΓ‘ vi pessoas em comunidades que participo usando o termo dessa forma (porΓ©m concordo tb que Γ© meio feio kkkkkk).

Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>
michellocana
michellocana previously approved these changes Feb 19, 2019
negreirosleo
negreirosleo previously approved these changes Feb 20, 2019
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
@halian-vilela halian-vilela self-assigned this Feb 26, 2019
Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>
@murtinha
murtinha dismissed stale reviews from negreirosleo and michellocana via f804a63 February 26, 2019 01:26
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Feb 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy preview for pt-br-reactjs ready!

Built with commit f804a63

https://deploy-preview-105--pt-br-reactjs.netlify.com

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Feb 26, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy preview for pt-br-reactjs ready!

Built with commit ec6acee

https://deploy-preview-105--pt-br-reactjs.netlify.com

@glaucia86 glaucia86 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@murtinha poucas mudanΓ§as a serem feitas. Realize as alteraΓ§Γ΅es listadas que o mais rΓ‘pido possΓ­vel estaremos aprovando a sua contribuiΓ§Γ£o.

Muito obrigada! :)

Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
Comment thread content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md Outdated
@glaucia86 glaucia86 added needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed and removed question Further information is requested labels Mar 3, 2019
@glaucia86

glaucia86 commented Mar 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@halian-vilela eu acho vΓ‘lido aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico (syntactic sugar), jΓ‘ vi pessoas em comunidades que participo usando o termo dessa forma (porΓ©m concordo tb que Γ© meio feio kkkkkk).

Nesse caso, nΓ£o tem como achar feio... pois no prΓ³prio wikipedia jΓ‘ define sobre o aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico. Cheguei a estudar sobre, nas aulas de algoritmo na Faculdade. Removendo a label question e incluindo aqui mais reviews para aprovar essa PR.

cc: @halian-vilela @eduardomoroni @cezaraugusto se puderem dar uma olhada nessa PR para que possamos aprovar o quanto antes :)

halian-vilela
halian-vilela previously approved these changes Mar 4, 2019
@halian-vilela

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@halian-vilela eu acho vΓ‘lido aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico (syntactic sugar), jΓ‘ vi pessoas em comunidades que participo usando o termo dessa forma (porΓ©m concordo tb que Γ© meio feio kkkkkk).

Nesse caso, nΓ£o tem como achar feito... pois no prΓ³prio wikipedia jΓ‘ define sobre o aΓ§ΓΊcar sintΓ‘tico. Cheguei a estudar sobre, nas aulas de algoritmo na Faculdade. Removendo a label question e incluindo aqui mais reviews para aprovar essa PR.

cc: @halian-vilela @eduardomoroni @cezaraugusto se puderem dar uma olhada nessa PR para que possamos aprovar o quanto antes :)

Deixei aprovado, @glaucia86, eu jΓ‘ tinha feito uma revisΓ£o geral, entΓ£o, assim que forem feitas as suas sugestΓ΅es pode mergear!

AbraΓ§os!

@glaucia86

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@murtinha sΓ³ fazer as alteraΓ§Γ΅es necessΓ‘rias que logo em seguida aprovaremos a sua excelente contribuiΓ§Γ£o! :)

Quando concluir nos sinalize com cc: @glaucia86 ou @halian-vilela

@jhonmike jhonmike removed the needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed label Mar 6, 2019
Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>
@murtinha
murtinha dismissed stale reviews from halian-vilela via a289fad March 8, 2019 12:06
Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>
@murtinha

murtinha commented Mar 8, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Desculpa a demora @glaucia86 , estava viajando, Obrigado pelo review

@jhonmike jhonmike added needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed and removed needs author response Changes requested needing author's input labels Mar 8, 2019
@murtinha

murtinha commented Mar 9, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@halian-vilela

@glaucia86 glaucia86 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@murtinha muito obrigada pela sua excelente contribuiΓ§Γ£o!

LGTM πŸ‘

cc: @halian-vilela @jhonmike sΓ³ aprovar! :)

@glaucia86

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bitmoji

cc: @murtinha muito obrigada pela sua contribuiΓ§Γ£o.

cc: @halian-vilela @jhonmike sΓ³ aprovar e mergear! :)

@glaucia86 glaucia86 added needs +1 Needs another approval before merging and removed needs review A pull request ready to be reviewed labels Mar 9, 2019
@jhonmike
jhonmike merged commit 69168a0 into reactjs:master Mar 9, 2019
@jhonmike jhonmike added 🌐 translated Translation is completed for this page and removed needs +1 Needs another approval before merging labels Mar 9, 2019
devin-ai-integration Bot pushed a commit to WalissonRodrigo/pt-br.react.dev that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2026
* Translate jsx-in-depth to pt-BR

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>

* Some small translation changes

* Update content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md

Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>

* Update content/docs/jsx-in-depth.md

Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-Authored-By: murtinha <ericmurta@hotmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🌐 translated Translation is completed for this page

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants