-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
relaxed ?Sized bound getting implied by super trait warn #140962
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
A-lintsArea: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.A-type-systemArea: Type systemArea: Type systemC-feature-requestCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.E-mediumCall for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-lintsArea: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.Area: Lints (warnings about flaws in source code) such as unused_mut.A-type-systemArea: Type systemArea: Type systemC-feature-requestCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.E-mediumCall for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Projects
Status
No status
Status
In progress
the following code should lint that the
?Sizedbound is unused:'we imply
Sizedas it's a super trait ofClone, so the?Sizedbound does not do anything.cc @davidtwco, related to
sized_hierarchymigration stuff