-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
Consider suggesting &mut TypeParam when given &TypeParam and that would fix the user's issue #81421
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-suggestion-diagnosticsArea: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`A-type-systemArea: Type systemArea: Type systemD-newcomer-roadblockDiagnostics: Confusing error or lint; hard to understand for new users.Diagnostics: Confusing error or lint; hard to understand for new users.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsA-suggestion-diagnosticsArea: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`Area: Suggestions generated by the compiler applied by `cargo fix`A-type-systemArea: Type systemArea: Type systemD-newcomer-roadblockDiagnostics: Confusing error or lint; hard to understand for new users.Diagnostics: Confusing error or lint; hard to understand for new users.T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
When given:
We currently emit:
What is likely desired instead is to use
&mut Stream.Seen in the wild at https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/l5osgu/why_does_a_reference_to_a_generic_parameter_not/