-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
[NLL] No "expected ..., found ..." in diagnostics #97267
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
A-NLLArea: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)Area: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsNLL-diagnosticsWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-NLLArea: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)Area: Non-lexical lifetimes (NLL)A-diagnosticsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsArea: Messages for errors, warnings, and lintsNLL-diagnosticsWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalWorking towards the "diagnostic parity" goalT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
This happens in a lot of tests, but from src/test/ui/traits/trait-upcasting/type-checking-test-4.rs:
before
after
Being able to compare the expected and found types in full make it clear what's wrong.