Remove remaining nolink usages.(fixes #12810)#12826
Closed
lpy wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
lpy:issue12810
Closed
Remove remaining nolink usages.(fixes #12810)#12826lpy wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom lpy:issue12810
lpy wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
lpy:issue12810
Conversation
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test shouldn't get removed, it should just remove the nolink attribute
Member
|
Looks good to me, thanks! |
Contributor
|
LGTM (with @alexcrichton comments addressed) |
Contributor
Author
|
Done! And squash! Thanks |
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2019
…=alexcrichton Rename and fix nolink-with-link-args test There are three problems with the nolink-with-link-args test: * The test fails when using MSVC. It's caused by the `linker-flavor=ld` flag which was added in rust-lang#46291. * In its comment, this test tests that "link_args are indeed passed when nolink is specified", but the `nolink` attribute has been removed [a long time ago](rust-lang#12826). * Pattern has a small typo. At first I was going to completely remove this test, but there is [a closed pull request for that](rust-lang#21090). So: * rename the file as suggested in the closed PR * adjust the comment * fix typo in the pattern * add `ignore-msvc`. r? @alexcrichton
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2019
…=alexcrichton Rename and fix nolink-with-link-args test There are three problems with the nolink-with-link-args test: * The test fails when using MSVC. It's caused by the `linker-flavor=ld` flag which was added in rust-lang#46291. * In its comment, this test tests that "link_args are indeed passed when nolink is specified", but the `nolink` attribute has been removed [a long time ago](rust-lang#12826). * Pattern has a small typo. At first I was going to completely remove this test, but there is [a closed pull request for that](rust-lang#21090). So: * rename the file as suggested in the closed PR * adjust the comment * fix typo in the pattern * add `ignore-msvc`. r? @alexcrichton
fasterthanlime
pushed a commit
to fasterthanlime/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2022
…ykril Enable (and fix) extra lint groups required for in-tree build This enables 3 lint groups that are required to build rust-analyzer as an "in-tree" (git subtree) tool in `rust-lang/rust`, and fixes all relevant diagnostics. This change is tracked in: * rust-lang/rust-analyzer#12818 Maintainer impact: more warnings, should be easy enough to fix them (it's mostly looking out for "rust-2015-isms", the lint group is poorly named). If you forget some, they'll show up during a `ra=>rust` sync.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
see #12810