docs: Enable required feature for 'closure_returning_async_block' lint#130343
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Sep 14, 2024
Merged
Conversation
Failing to do this results in the lint example output complaining about the lint not existing instead of the thing the lint is supposed to be complaining about.
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cjgillot (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
compiler-errors
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2024
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2024
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#130017 (coverage: Extract `executor::block_on` from several async coverage tests) - rust-lang#130268 (simd_shuffle: require index argument to be a vector) - rust-lang#130290 (Stabilize entry_insert) - rust-lang#130294 (Lifetime cleanups) - rust-lang#130343 (docs: Enable required feature for 'closure_returning_async_block' lint) - rust-lang#130349 (Fix `Parser::break_up_float`'s right span) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130343 - Fayti1703:patch-correct-async-block-lint-doc, r=compiler-errors docs: Enable required feature for 'closure_returning_async_block' lint Failing to do this results in the lint example output complaining about the lint not existing instead of the thing the lint is supposed to be complaining about. See <https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#closure-returning-async-block>: 
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Failing to do this results in the lint example output complaining about the lint not existing instead of the thing the lint is supposed to be complaining about.
See https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#closure-returning-async-block:
