Conversation
As file URLs cannot have username/password/port we don’t want to allow changing the scheme of a URL that contains one or more of those components. Fixes #259.
|
This looks good to me to fix the issue, but I'm worried about the change seems a new behaviour that browsers don't have yet. |
|
Tests at web-platform-tests/wpt#5112. Yeah, we'll need to file browser bugs. What browsers currently do doesn't make any sense, so hopefully this can still change. |
| and <var>buffer</var> is "<code>file</code>", then return. | ||
|
|
||
| <li><p>If <var>url</var>'s <a for=url>scheme</a> is "<code>file</code>" and its | ||
| <a for=url>host</a> is an <a>empty host</a> or null, then return. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the last item must be:
4. If url's host is an empty host or null, and buffer is a non-"file" special scheme, then return.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's only "file" that can come here and hit this. Other non-special schemes cannot be set to special schemes due to the earlier steps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess I could remove the check for scheme being "file" though, since only file can have an empty/null host.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, that would be bad, since that would also block non-special URLs without host from changing schemes. Oops.
Since file URLs can not have `username/password/port`, the specification was updated to restrict setting protocol to "file". Refs: whatwg/url#269 Fixes: nodejs#11785
Since file URLs can not have `username/password/port`, the specification was updated to restrict setting protocol to "file". Refs: whatwg/url#269 Fixes: #11785 PR-URL: #11887 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Since file URLs can not have `username/password/port`, the specification was updated to restrict setting protocol to "file". Refs: whatwg/url#269 Fixes: nodejs#11785 PR-URL: nodejs#11887 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Since file URLs can not have `username/password/port`, the specification was updated to restrict setting protocol to "file". Refs: whatwg/url#269 Fixes: #11785 PR-URL: #11887 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
4 participants
As file URLs cannot have username/password/port we don’t want to allow
changing the scheme of a URL that contains one or more of those
components.
Fixes #259.
Preview | Diff