Comment Re:Ah, Jane, Jane, Jane ... (Score 1) 90
Yes, I read that subject line in Dan Aykroyd's voice.
Yes, I read that subject line in Dan Aykroyd's voice.
they are also working to stop fuel efficiency standards in ICE cars
Our state (Washington) is doing more by imposing high sales taxes and license fees on newer (like electric) vehicles.
I went by [cough, choke, wheeze] diesel bus.
Shhh! Nobody tell him about Google.
Anthropic is a a national security supply-chain risk. If they can't even keep people out of their stuff, what business do they have handling classified material?
Fine if you (a meat-sack) do it with a clean room process. But the product of the LLM has no legitimate copyright. And so the "Sell it as closed source" is in error. Sure, you can sell it. But I can copy it and there's nothing that ca be done.
If you were rich and needed something Epstein likely had a friend who owed him a favor who could help you.
It's the quid pro quo that we worry about. These were all off the books deals. And there's no telling how many young nubiles got traded in the process.
Damned cat!
Most likely a combination of domestic problems, mental health issues (maybe*), random violence and a few anti-technology Ted Kaczynskis running around.
Most people with high level security clearances are watched by counter intelligence. Not always because they are untrustworthy, but they are targets for blackmail. Dead scientists do foreign adversaries no good. Same for missing scientists. They are best kept at their job, copying stuff.
*Mental health? Counter intel does make use of behavioral analysis resources. As one person there put it, they don't want another Jonathan Pollard slipping through.
nothing related to NASA indicates a national security threat
Makes sense. NASA poses no risk that humans will ever be able to leave this planet long term. Add SLS to that and the aliens are probably sitting back,eating popcorn.
It's just like a giant Kerbal Space Program game.
about:config
JavaScript disable
Screwdrivers. Ask Bernhard Goetz.
Folding blade pocket knifes make little difference whether locking or not. Most "working knives" are fixed blade and therefore marginally legal even under UK law. Go ahead. Prove I'm not on my way to my chef's job. Locking/not locking makes little difference when commiting assaults. It does affect a knife's use as a tool. Non locking blades are definitely weapons. Period.
UK law obviously written by a bunch of aristocrats who have never gotten their hands dirty or calloused.
Its England
Stabbed. Not shot.
Read.
C++ is the best example of second-system effect since OS/360.