I saw change, I use AI tools every day, I am not seeing big gains with newer models.

I believe LLMs are plateauing, more data and more parameters will not lead to notceably better tools.

AI tools are useful. The AI crash is coming.

I use AI every day. But despite repeatedly being told how wonderful the latest models now are, and seeing stories of people ( usually with their own AI tools to sell ) who claim not to write code any more, even moderately complex problems seem beyond the AI. While, worse, the AIs keep claiming to understand problems which they clearly do not.

"These systems are powerful and continue to get more powerful."
We are not seeing this. I think LLM usefulness for coding has plateaued and feeding them more data and adding more parameters is not translating to the real-world gains that the AI companies promote, and have to promote because otherwise they will go bust.
More and more users are calling them out ( and even claiming older models were better ) and local, free, open source models are improving faster than Big AI.

AIs are useful. But the AI crash is coming.

So this one is a bit better than the last "I see now what I did wrong. Let me fix that for you"

But I thought you told us that by now no programmer would
  have a job ?
And I still have one.

Go bust already, Dirty Sam and friends.

If the AI used ANY open source code in its training, then it CANNOT work in a clean room.

And if it did, it should be easy enough to prove that.

The coming century.

I use my laptop exclusively at home and in the office with multiple external screens.
The size of the laptop's own screen is almost irrelevant.
And a 16" laptop is a big thing to lug around on the commute.

"A bark" ?

"Because it has a 13" screen."

I think you must be new in the marketing department, and worked in a technical field previously ?

Elon: The last five Starship Version 3 launches have failed disastrously.

CursorX: Sorry, Elon, I see now what I did wrong. Let me fix that for you.

Elon: The last six Starship Version 3 launches have failed disastrously.

[...]

Yes, this deal is crazy and Musk does lots of dubious cross-company deals.

But your comment fails on the fact that Spacex is a real industry leader and is actually worth trillions.

When AI crashes, I just hope these AI side business don't jeopardize the real business of Spacex - launching stuff to space for much less than 10x what the competition charge.

What does Cursor bring to be worth $60 billion ?

I'd write Elon a Vscode extension for ... half that. And throw in a VS2022 plugin for FREE.

Yes, they had to develop the Iphone film, and forgot to stream that bit, that must be it.

That says "during launch" but the last live video frames transmitted actually showed the car at roughly 500,000 miles away, far exceeding the distance of the Moon (about 238,000 miles).
And far, far beyond LEO.

Yes, they have:

"The car, mounted on the rocket's second stage, was launched on an escape trajectory and entered an elliptical heliocentric orbit crossing the orbit of Mars.[6] The orbit reaches a maximum distance from the Sun at aphelion of 1.66 astronomical units (au).[4] Video of the Roadster during the launch was transmitted back to the mission control center and live-streamed."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk%27s_Tesla_Roadster

Spacex's Starship gives us LIVE video of fucking reentry plasma, flaps as they disintegrate with the heat, splashdown.

After a couple of weeks, NASA's Artemis finds an Iphone video one of the crew took.

Welcome to Slaishdot.

News for Neural Nets, Stuff that Models.