Log inSign up
Sam Gershman
2,686 posts
Sam Gershman profile banner
@gershbrain

Sam Gershman

@gershbrain
Professor, Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University
Cambridge, MA
gershmanlab.com/index.html
Joined July 2016
58
Following
16.5K
Followers
RepliesRepliesRepostsRepostsMediaMedia

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email
Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
  • @gershbrain
    Sam Gershman
    @gershbrain
    Nov 5, 2024
    I love this project, which feels like it opens many doors.
    @TomerUllman
    Tomer Ullman
    @TomerUllman
    Nov 5, 2024
    Looking for a distraction (for some reason)? May I interest you in this cool new paper on "Blending simulation and abstraction for physical reasoning"? (by Sosa, Gershman, and me) paper link: sciencedirect.com/science/articl… OSF: osf.io/preprints/psya…
    Image
    Image
    Image
    1
  • @gershbrain
    Sam Gershman
    @gershbrain
    Oct 30, 2024
    Great opportunity here!!
    @jehosafet
    Jay Hennig
    @jehosafet
    Oct 28, 2024
    I'm hiring a postdoc to work with me on problems related to meta-learning and probabilistic representation learning in the brain. Perks: i) the amazing research community at @bcm_neurosci and @RiceNeuro. ii) Houston food is DELICIOUS (and cheap) jobs.bcm.edu/job/Postdoctor…
  • @gershbrain
    Sam Gershman
    @gershbrain
    Oct 19, 2024
    @yyyxiang has a new paper with me and @kevin_dorst showing that you don't find a gambler's fallacy in probability judgments (by you do in point predictions): osf.io/preprints/psya… This dissociation suggests that the gambler's fallacy doesn't arise from probabilistic reasoning.
  • @gershbrain
    Sam Gershman
    @gershbrain
    Oct 19, 2024
    I think my point here has been misunderstood by most commentators. Obviously I agree that ephys is a more direct measure of spiking activity. Let me try to clarify...
    @gershbrain
    Sam Gershman
    @gershbrain
    Oct 17, 2024
    Papers that report neuronal recordings sometimes say that they provide "direct" evidence for neural encoding of something, in contrast to "indirect" methods such as non-invasive brain imaging. I don't really understand this. What makes one "direct" and the other "indirect"?
    3
  • @gershbrain
    Sam Gershman
    @gershbrain
    Oct 17, 2024
    Papers that report neuronal recordings sometimes say that they provide "direct" evidence for neural encoding of something, in contrast to "indirect" methods such as non-invasive brain imaging. I don't really understand this. What makes one "direct" and the other "indirect"?
    18
Advertisement
Advertisement