1. X
  2. Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
Log inSign up
Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
17.2K posts
Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘» profile banner
user avatar

Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»

@oomahq
Running BIP-110πŸͺ’ & DATUM🌊 | @BcnBitcoinOnly elder | Activate #OP_DROP_CGT | Distributed Authoritarian | 5 Ph/s home miner of last resort
Joined November 2024
718
Following
4,125
Followers
RepliesRepliesMediaMedia
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    Aug 7
    I did my own investigation because I obviously don't trust them. What I found is that the external dependency of the firmware with the critical vulnerability hidden in it was written by CoinKite's CTO @DocHex pretending to be someone else. All of the following can be verified:
    Image
    user avatar
    COLDCARD
    @COLDCARDwallet
    Aug 7
    Replying to @OccamiCrypto
    As promised we are doing all the investigation we can to get to the bottom of it. We are devastated. The hacker could have done the right thing and responsibly disclosed.
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    Aug 13
    My stance on the HF Blake coin: I'm keeping both tokens for now, and I'm not making any txs until I understand how to replay-protect them to one chain or the other. Currently I believe the 3 chains are fucked. It's been shown that the big Sv1 pools can set the consensus rules of
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    Aug 13
    If coretards were intelligent they would have lobbied the dominant pools to adopt BIP-110 instead of blocking it. So as to keep the appearances of decentralization like in 2017.
    Image
    GIF
    user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    Aug 10
    Replying to @oomahq @giacomozucco and 2 others
    ^ I stored this screenshot in my meme folder because it has some modicum of historical value, don't you agree? It proves several facts: 1. That BIP-110 opponents took it seriously and were afraid it would be adopted. 2. That Bitcoin mining is too centralized to the point that
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    Aug 10
    Mystery shitpoaster wins the Twitter Games again.
    Image
    Image
    user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    May 6
    Resuming my mystery shitpoaster series for all the Saylor fans out there.
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus πŸ‘»
    @oomahq
    Aug 10
    IMO BIP-110 is (so far) the most important event in Bitcoin of the 2020s, even more than Taproot activation. Every bitcoiner can see that mining has been almost from the start too centralized for the canonical game-theory to hold in practice. However mining pools had always kept
    user avatar
    Giacomo Zucco (Bear Market Edition)
    @giacomozucco
    Aug 10
    Replying to @disnocen
    BIP110 was in itself a non-event, indeed, but it was connected with many important but suntle things about Bitcoin that people struggle to learn and understand: - validity rules vs standardness policies, - rule restriction vs rule relaxation, - active change vs passive status

Log in or sign up for X

See what’s happening and join the conversation

Continue with phone
or
Log in with username or email
TermsΒ·PrivacyΒ·CookiesΒ·AccessibilityΒ·Ads InfoΒ·Β© 2026 X Corp.
Advertisement
Advertisement