You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Posters use training dataset images as a demo of before/after results of their model applied, making it look disproportionally better than the real thing. And I'm not even talking about using training images for testing, it's just straight up "after: original image, before: original image damaged by compression/blur".
Look at this, for example, https://openmodeldb.info/models/2x-StarSample-V2-HQ first comparison shows as if the model can recover perfectly the "vector" look, even the little detail at the top. But the real deal looks like the same image here https://openmodeldb.info/models/2x-StarSample-V2-Lite , with blur. And even then it won't be right to use the training image to demonstrate model performance.
Activity
joeyballentine commentedon Oct 15, 2026
Oh yikes, thanks for letting us know