Repository navigation
[22.06 backport] profiles: seccomp: add syscalls related to PKU in default policy - #43812
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Add pkey_alloc(2), pkey_free(2) and pkey_mprotect(2) in seccomp default profile. pkey_alloc(2), pkey_free(2) and pkey_mprotect(2) can only configure the calling process's own memory, so they are existing "safe for everyone" syscalls. close issue: moby#43481 Signed-off-by: zhubojun <bojun.zhu@foxmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e258d66) Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
AkihiroSuda
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2022
cpuguy83
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pkey_mprotect(2), pkey_alloc(2), pkey_free(2)) #43481Add pkey_alloc(2), pkey_free(2) and pkey_mprotect(2) in seccomp default profile.
pkey_alloc(2), pkey_free(2) and pkey_mprotect(2) can only configure
the calling process's own memory, so they are existing "safe for everyone" syscalls.
close issue: #43481
(cherry picked from commit e258d66)
- Description for the changelog
- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)