[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Rename ConstS to ConstData #105770 (Rename ConstS to ConstData)
• Add regression test for #55976 #105785 (Add regression test for rustc seemingly generates invalid IR #55976)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

[bors]

📌 Commit 905caed has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 905caed with merge 49c2279...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 49c2279 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Perf Build Sha
#105785	16cc9670e71d16fc57b3e2a2f436c7231beff9d2
#105770	4e32df8609cd0adc77a412ffde82122a5501b20c

previous master: fde3000299

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (49c2279): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.9%	[4.9%, 4.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.