[3.7] bpo-32604: Make _xxsubinterpreters build on Windows (GH-5516)#5624
Merged
zware merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from Feb 11, 2018
Merged
[3.7] bpo-32604: Make _xxsubinterpreters build on Windows (GH-5516)#5624zware merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from
zware merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from
Conversation
This is not the ideal solution; this means that a test module is now always included in the main python3x.dll. However, we're already including xxsubtype, so why not? (cherry picked from commit 310b052) Co-authored-by: Zachary Ware <[email protected]>
Contributor
Author
|
@zware: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks, @zware! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is not the ideal solution; this means that a test module is now
always included in the main python3x.dll. However, we're already
including xxsubtype, so why not?
(cherry picked from commit 310b052)
Co-authored-by: Zachary Ware [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue32604