Another performance improvement on the Formatter by using Kernel#sprintf over String#%#75
Merged
ioquatix merged 2 commits intoruby:masterfrom Dec 8, 2022
Merged
Conversation
nobu
reviewed
May 5, 2022
String#% takes the arguments as an Array object, which requires us to create an extra object.
Co-authored-by: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
578190f to
bd28656
Compare
matzbot
pushed a commit
to ruby/ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2022
using Kernel#sprintf over String#% (ruby/logger#75) * Prefer Kernel#sprintf over String#% for formatting Strings
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
String#%takes the arguments as an Array object, which requires us to create an extra object (like we're doing here).Also, while both
String#%andKernel#sprintfinternally falls backrb_str_formatin the current CRuby implementation, the former seems to be performing a little bit of argument checking, which possibly causes a very subtle performance difference (?).Anyway, here's a benchmark of
String#%vsKernel#sprintf.P.S. I have no strong preference on whether to use
Kernel#sprintforKernel#format. I'm happy to rewrite the patch to callformat(...)(orKernel.sprintf(...)orKernel.format(...)) if the maintainer has any preference.