You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
constCategory=z.object({getsubcategories(){// ~~~~~~~~~~~~~// Subcategory implicitly has type 'any' because of circular// resolution.returnz.array(Category);}});
Zod and similar libraries are motivation here.
While processing the object literal, we normally defer return types for get accessors.
But when validating the constraint, we start pulling on those very types.
One idea: when we try to resolve a call that is already undergoing resolution, we say "don't check constraints".
Why don't we disable constraint checking for all calls and do it in another pass?
We're not always interested in just generating an error, we're often trying to grab the constraint for other information (e.g. if there's no candidates, we have to fix to the constraint).
How does this affect overloads? Because this would affect how we choose overloads, right?
Should not play in?
Could we just return the original uninstantiated type parameter from the call when you detect this circularity?
How would that work? Isn't that a type parameter leak?
Yes, but the idea is there's an "outer" call and an "inner" call. The inner call would leak a type parameter (e.g. T) and the outer call would instantiate it after inference.
Scary, but maybe!
Outstanding PRs are likely not quite what we're looking for, but may have a PR prototyping these ideas soon.
Activity