Skip to content

configparser does not convert defaults to strings #68023

Closed

Description

@aragilar
mannequin
BPO 23835
Nosy @warsaw, @vstinner, @bitdancer, @ambv, @aragilar, @asottile, @miss-islington, @junyixie
PRs
  • bpo-23835: Enforce that configparser defaults are strings #2558
  • bpo-23835: [docs] configparser converts defaults to strings #3176
  • bpo-23835: Restore legacy defaults= behavior for RawConfigParser #3191
  • bpo-33802: Do not interpolate in ConfigParser while reading defaults #7524
  • [3.7] bpo-33802: Do not interpolate in ConfigParser while reading defaults (GH-7524) #7529
  • Files
  • py27-config-fix.patch
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = <Date 2018-06-08.17:10:28.583>
    created_at = <Date 2015-04-01.04:23:08.378>
    labels = ['3.7', 'deferred-blocker', 'type-bug', 'library']
    title = 'configparser does not convert defaults to strings'
    updated_at = <Date 2021-03-13.13:23:31.799>
    user = 'https://github.com/aragilar'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2021-03-13.13:23:31.799>
    actor = 'vstinner'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2018-06-08.17:10:28.583>
    closer = 'barry'
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2015-04-01.04:23:08.378>
    creator = 'aragilar'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['38861']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 23835
    keywords = ['patch', '3.7regression']
    message_count = 16.0
    messages = ['239768', '240249', '297793', '298205', '298234', '298279', '300660', '300661', '300717', '300791', '318983', '318999', '319047', '319066', '320899', '323285']
    nosy_count = 8.0
    nosy_names = ['barry', 'vstinner', 'r.david.murray', 'lukasz.langa', 'aragilar', 'Anthony Sottile', 'miss-islington', 'JunyiXie']
    pr_nums = ['2558', '3176', '3191', '7524', '7529']
    priority = 'deferred blocker'
    resolution = 'fixed'
    stage = 'resolved'
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = 'behavior'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue23835'
    versions = ['Python 3.7']

    Activity

    1. aragilar commented on Apr 1, 2015

      aragilarmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      ConfigParser(defaults={1:2.4}) and ConfigParser(defaults={"a":5.2}) cause an exception when configparser tries to perform string operations on 1 and 5.2. I didn't see it documented that defaults must only contain strings, and using ConfigParser['DEFAULT'] = {1:2.4} does the necessary string conversion, so it looks like there should be some conversion done to the defaults.

    2. added
      type-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dump
      stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
      on Apr 1, 2015
    3. added
      type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
      and removed
      type-crashA hard crash of the interpreter, possibly with a core dump
      on Apr 1, 2015
    4. aragilar commented on Apr 8, 2015

      aragilarmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Here's a patch for 2.7 (based of the head of the 2.7 branch), something similar could be done for 3.4 (I wasn't sure what branch I was supposed to base the patch off, since 3.4 is inactive). The string requirement was already noted in the docstring of the configparser module, but that's not mentioned in the main docs. Also, I wasn't sure where to put a test in because there was not test_configparser.py located in Lib/test.

    5. bitdancer commented on Jul 6, 2017

      @bitdancer
      Member

      I'm guessing we can only do something here in 3.7, for backward compatibility reasons, but maybe I'm wrong. Hopefully Lukasz will notice the activity on the issue and have time to take a look.

    6. ambv commented on Jul 12, 2017

      @ambv
      Contributor

      Responded on the PR.

    7. bitdancer commented on Jul 12, 2017

      @bitdancer
      Member

      Thanks. OK, so you agree a fix is appropriate. What about the question of backport/backward compatibility?

    8. ambv commented on Jul 13, 2017

      @ambv
      Contributor

      Backwards compatibility will be considered when the patch is ready. I'm not overly worried about fixing a case that currently raises exceptions all over the place. There's few compatibility concerns that we need to consider in this case.

    9. ambv commented on Aug 21, 2017

      @ambv
      Contributor

      New changeset 44e6ad8 by Łukasz Langa (James Tocknell) in branch 'master':
      bpo-23835: Enforce that configparser defaults are strings (bpo-2558)
      44e6ad8

    10. ambv commented on Aug 21, 2017

      @ambv
      Contributor

      New changeset ea57923 by Łukasz Langa in branch 'master':
      bpo-23835: [docs] configparser converts defaults to strings (bpo-3176)
      ea57923

    11. ambv commented on Aug 22, 2017

      @ambv
      Contributor

      I merged the original fix and documented it. I thought about it some more and remembered that RawConfigParser objects do in fact support non-string values by historical coincidence. It's unfortunately a popular idiom with old programs to load some configuration defaults using the defaults= keyword and later use the legacy get() and set() API which doesn't check types inside. A config file like this cannot be safely written back to a file, etc.

      I would very much like to get rid of RawConfigParser entirely but we're stuck with it due to backwards compatibility. So, to fix the regression, I created PR 3191.

    12. ambv commented on Aug 24, 2017

      @ambv
      Contributor

      New changeset a5fab17 by Łukasz Langa in branch 'master':
      bpo-23835: Restore legacy defaults= behavior for RawConfigParser (bpo-3191)
      a5fab17

    13. warsaw commented on Jun 7, 2018

      @warsaw
      Member

      I think this introduced a regression in 3.7. See bpo-33802

      https://bugs.python.org/issue33802

    14. reopened this on Jun 7, 2018
    15. vstinner commented on Jun 8, 2018

      @vstinner
      Member

      It seems like this issue introduced a regression according to Barry: bpo-33802.

    16. ambv commented on Jun 8, 2018

      @ambv
      Contributor

      New changeset 214f18e by Łukasz Langa in branch 'master':
      bpo-33802: Do not interpolate in ConfigParser while reading defaults (GH-7524)
      214f18e

    17. miss-islington commented on Jun 8, 2018

      @miss-islington
      Contributor

      New changeset f44203d by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.7':
      bpo-33802: Do not interpolate in ConfigParser while reading defaults (GH-7524)
      f44203d

    18. asottile commented on Jul 2, 2018

      asottilemannequin
      Mannequin

      Unclear if this regression (from this patch) is intentional or not:

      $ python3.6 -c 'import configparser; configparser.ConfigParser(defaults={"a": None})'
      $ python3.7 -c 'import configparser; configparser.ConfigParser(defaults={"a": None})'
      Traceback (most recent call last):
        File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
        File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.7.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/configparser.py", line 638, in __init__
          self._read_defaults(defaults)
        File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.7.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/configparser.py", line 1216, in _read_defaults
          self.read_dict({self.default_section: defaults})
        File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.7.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/configparser.py", line 753, in read_dict
          self.set(section, key, value)
        File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.7.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/configparser.py", line 1197, in set
          self._validate_value_types(option=option, value=value)
        File "/usr/local/Cellar/python/3.7.0/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/lib/python3.7/configparser.py", line 1182, in _validate_value_types
          raise TypeError("option values must be strings")
      TypeError: option values must be strings
      
    19. ambv commented on Aug 8, 2018

      @ambv
      Contributor

      That's intentional. In ConfigParser objects this exception would be raised for any other section's assignment already. You want RawConfigParser if you want to put (invalid) types as option values. See:

      >>> cp = ConfigParser()
      >>> cp['asd'] = {'a': None}
      Traceback (most recent call last):
      ...
      TypeError: option values must be strings
      >>> rcp = RawConfigParser()
      >>> rcp['asd'] = {'a': None}
      >>>
    20. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      3.7 (EOL)end of lifedeferred-blockerstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions