You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Hang with contextlib.ExitStack and subprocess.Popen (regression) #71309
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee='https://github.com/gpshead'closed_at=<Date2016-06-20.02:31:31.349>created_at=<Date2016-05-25.11:48:00.220>labels= ['type-bug']
title='Hang with contextlib.ExitStack and subprocess.Popen (regression)'updated_at=<Date2017-03-25.00:31:22.113>user='https://bugs.python.org/ValentinDavid'
It's a regression introduced by the PEP-479 in Lib/contextlib.py by the changeset 36a8d935c322, "PEP-479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators (Closes issue bpo-22906)".
diff -r 0af15b8ef3b2 Lib/contextlib.py--- a/Lib/contextlib.py Thu May 12 10:37:58 2016 +0300+++ b/Lib/contextlib.py Wed May 25 15:56:50 2016 +0200@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ class _GeneratorContextManager(ContextDe
# (see PEP 479).
if exc.__cause__ is value:
return False
+ if exc is value:+ return
raise
except:
# only re-raise if it's *not* the exception that was
The suggested fix looks basically correct to me - the problem is that the new except clause added by that patch is currently missing the "don't re-raise the passed in exception" logic needed to fully abide by the context management protocol, but we missed that on the patch review.
The only tweak I would recommend is putting that check before the check for StopIteration being converted to RuntimeError so it's immediately obvious to the reader that it takes priority over the exc.__cause__ check.
The comment on that clause should also be adjusted to reflect the fixed behaviour.
Experimenting with this locally, it looks like the C level hang is indeed due to bpo-25782, but the fact that we're implicitly trying to do "exc.__context__ = exc" is a new bug in _GeneratorContextManager introduced by the PEP-479 changes.
However, I'm now wondering whether that's also revealed a more general oversight in ExitStack's "_fix_exception_context" internal helper function: it's not explicitly handling the case where an __exit__ method re-raises the exception that was passed in, rather than returning a false value (indicating to the context management machinery that it should re-raise the original exception). I just hadn't noticed that before since all stdlib context managers are well-behaved in that regard (modulo bugs like the PEP-479 one).
Some failed attempts to create a simpler reproducer than Victor's last example show it isn't straightforward to get the current code to misbehave, but an upfront check for "new_exc is old_exc" may still be a worthwhile defensive coding measure.
Proposed fix based on STINNER and Nick's earlier comments and the simple reproducer turned into a test.
Nick - your most recent comment makes me wonder if this shouldn't be doing more.
this does make both hang_bug*.py examples do something reasonable.
I'm at a loss for what Misc/NEWS entry to write for this one as I don't know how to accurately describe the scope of the problem. I'd also like to avoid conflating bpo-25782's problem with this one (that causes the hang, but once that is fixed isn't there still a problem here to be fixed)?
Greg, I think you should apply your change to eliminate the regression and get us back to the state of all stdlib context managers being well-behaved in this regard (we unfortunately missed the 3.5.2 release, but that will ensure it's fixed for 3.5.3).
Given the challenges I had trying to reproduce the hang with a plain context manager rather than a generator, I now the problem is specifically just bpo-25782 - in the absence of that, ExitStack() should misbehave in the same way actual nested with statements would, rather than trying to implicitly "fix" the misbehaving context managers.
Greg, there was also a (different!) typo of the issue number in the code comment committed with this fix; that typo hasn't been fixed. Sent me on quite the chase looking for this bug. (I tracked down the bug independently, then wasn't able to repro it on trunk and found your fix and code comment). It's an impressive achievement to typo the same bug ID two different ways within the same twelve-line patch! ;-)
Activity
ValentinDavid commentedon May 25, 2016
The attached script hangs while using 100% on Python 3.5.1 but not on Python 3.4.3. Tested both on Gentoo Linux and Ubuntu Linux.
The loop seems to be in PyErr_SetObject in a loop that recursively go through PyException_GetContext.
subprocess.Popen seems to cause the issue while calling io.open. strace reveals a error on call to lseek on a pipe.
The issue does not happen when using nested "with" instead of ExitStack.
vstinner commentedon May 25, 2016
Simplified script to reproduce the bug.
vstinner commentedon May 25, 2016
It's a regression introduced by the PEP-479 in Lib/contextlib.py by the changeset 36a8d935c322, "PEP-479: Change StopIteration handling inside generators (Closes issue bpo-22906)".
vstinner commentedon May 25, 2016
Workaround, or maybe fix?, for the issue:
ncoghlan commentedon May 25, 2016
The suggested fix looks basically correct to me - the problem is that the new except clause added by that patch is currently missing the "don't re-raise the passed in exception" logic needed to fully abide by the context management protocol, but we missed that on the patch review.
The only tweak I would recommend is putting that check before the check for StopIteration being converted to RuntimeError so it's immediately obvious to the reader that it takes priority over the exc.__cause__ check.
The comment on that clause should also be adjusted to reflect the fixed behaviour.
vstinner commentedon May 25, 2016
We should also fix this function to avoid the infinite loop.
Maybe we should deny setting "exc.__context__=exc" (modify PyException_SetContext for that). Maybe raise a new RuntimeError in this case?
1st1 commentedon May 25, 2016
There is a patch for that somewhere on the tracker
Vgr255 commentedon May 25, 2016
Yes, and it seems that it is waiting for a review. http://bugs.python.org/issue25782
ncoghlan commentedon May 26, 2016
Experimenting with this locally, it looks like the C level hang is indeed due to bpo-25782, but the fact that we're implicitly trying to do "exc.__context__ = exc" is a new bug in _GeneratorContextManager introduced by the PEP-479 changes.
However, I'm now wondering whether that's also revealed a more general oversight in ExitStack's "_fix_exception_context" internal helper function: it's not explicitly handling the case where an __exit__ method re-raises the exception that was passed in, rather than returning a false value (indicating to the context management machinery that it should re-raise the original exception). I just hadn't noticed that before since all stdlib context managers are well-behaved in that regard (modulo bugs like the PEP-479 one).
Some failed attempts to create a simpler reproducer than Victor's last example show it isn't straightforward to get the current code to misbehave, but an upfront check for "new_exc is old_exc" may still be a worthwhile defensive coding measure.
gpshead commentedon Jun 12, 2016
Proposed fix based on STINNER and Nick's earlier comments and the simple reproducer turned into a test.
Nick - your most recent comment makes me wonder if this shouldn't be doing more.
this does make both hang_bug*.py examples do something reasonable.
I'm at a loss for what Misc/NEWS entry to write for this one as I don't know how to accurately describe the scope of the problem. I'd also like to avoid conflating bpo-25782's problem with this one (that causes the hang, but once that is fixed isn't there still a problem here to be fixed)?
ncoghlan commentedon Jun 13, 2016
Greg, I think you should apply your change to eliminate the regression and get us back to the state of all stdlib context managers being well-behaved in this regard (we unfortunately missed the 3.5.2 release, but that will ensure it's fixed for 3.5.3).
Given the challenges I had trying to reproduce the hang with a plain context manager rather than a generator, I now the problem is specifically just bpo-25782 - in the absence of that, ExitStack() should misbehave in the same way actual nested with statements would, rather than trying to implicitly "fix" the misbehaving context managers.
4 remaining items
python-dev commentedon Jun 14, 2016
New changeset 6bb68eae63e8 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.5':
bpo-27122: fix typo in the news file, wrong issue #. not bpo-27123.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6bb68eae63e8
New changeset 4e1dbfcc9449 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
bpo-27122: fix typo in the news file, wrong issue #. not bpo-27123.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4e1dbfcc9449
serhiy-storchaka commentedon Jun 14, 2016
Is it worth to add more specific tests for __context__ and __cause__ attributes of an exception?
ncoghlan commentedon Jun 15, 2016
There's an existing scenario test at https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Lib/test/test_contextlib.py#l600 and https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Lib/test/test_contextlib.py#l648 that aims to ensure ExitStack unwinding and context setting matches the behaviour of actual with statements.
It wouldn't hurt to add some explicit checks to the new test for this particular bug, though.
serhiy-storchaka commentedon Jun 18, 2016
Here are additional tests.
ncoghlan commentedon Jun 20, 2016
Serhiy's test changes look good to me!
python-dev commentedon Jun 20, 2016
New changeset a14b93a4eb49 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.5':
Added more tests for issue bpo-27122.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a14b93a4eb49
New changeset ebc82b840163 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Added more tests for issue bpo-27122.
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ebc82b840163
carljm commentedon Oct 25, 2016
Greg, there was also a (different!) typo of the issue number in the code comment committed with this fix; that typo hasn't been fixed. Sent me on quite the chase looking for this bug. (I tracked down the bug independently, then wasn't able to repro it on trunk and found your fix and code comment). It's an impressive achievement to typo the same bug ID two different ways within the same twelve-line patch! ;-)
gpshead commentedon Oct 25, 2016
we talented!
berkerpeksag commentedon Mar 25, 2017
New changeset c6d2f49 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.5':
bpo-27122: Fix comment to point to correct issue number (#50)
c6d2f49
berkerpeksag commentedon Mar 25, 2017
New changeset 89b1824 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.6':
bpo-27122: Fix comment to point to correct issue number (#48)
89b1824
berkerpeksag commentedon Mar 25, 2017
New changeset af88e7e by Berker Peksag (Nathaniel J. Smith) in branch 'master':
bpo-27122: Fix comment to point to correct issue number (#47)
af88e7e