Share Your Feedback

Hi Figma Forum! We’re rolling out some changes that will make organizing team files more flexible and intuitive — and we want to hear from you. 👈🏻A Figma workspace organized with nested folders.As more work happens in Figma, files can get harder to find. In the coming weeks, we’ll introduce folders, so you can structure files to mirror the ways your teams work.Here’s what’s changing:Projects become folders. All files in Teams will live in folders. Any previous reference to Projects in the UI will be renamed to Folders. Subfolders and colors. Nest folders and assign folders colors to create hierarchy. Simpler sharing. Subfolders inherit access from the folder above it by default, or you can limit access to specific people.What’s not changing:Workspaces and teams — these structures will stay exactly the same as before. Who can access folders — the same people who had access to the project before have access to the folder now. This includes Connected projects, now called Connected folde

While applying for the Figma Education plan, I noticed the mandatory Terms of Service agreement is presented as a Yes/No radio-button choice.Because the user must agree in order to proceed, selecting “No” doesn't provide an alternative path. However, presenting “No, I do not agree” as an equal radio option can create an expectation that disagreeing may still allow the user to continue.A single “I agree” checkbox might communicate the interaction more clearly: unchecked = agreement hasn't been provided; checked = the prerequisite has been fulfilled.I understand the current design may intentionally make the consequence of declining explicit, but I wonder whether the radio pattern introduces a false affordance by presenting a choice that isn't actually actionable.  

The Publish Library action feels really hidden, and its location doesn't make much sense in a design system file.Why not make it a global action, similar to the Share button? When you're working on the design system figma file, publishing the library is one of the primary actions.Right now the flow is:Assets → Library icon → Publish → Wait...It feels unnecessarily buried. Let's make our lives easier.

Hello,some feedback from my side regarding Folders, I like the options of a nestable folder, but I find it hard to navigate to the files I’m looking for. The folders are named, but the file thumbnails that were visible with Projects were a huge readability feature that I’m really missing now.I was searching for it in settings, but couldn’t find a way to set it. I actually added a description to a folder, but did not actually see not one place that the description was shown? This part is especially confusing.If I could make an improvement suggestion to a current implementation it would be to have a setting to show or not to show some folder contents thumbnails, similar to the previous implementation.Fingers crossed this can be done!

The captcha puzzles to verify your login might be the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen in my entire life. I’m supposed to match a pattern to an image with an astronaut standing on top of said pattern so I can’t even see it. And the image is AI generated so the pattern isn’t even an exact match anyways. And I also have to do 3-5 of these just to login. Captcha has always been an AI training tool but at least it used to not be so blatant.

The announcement of Figma Motion had me excited, but right now it feels like a more advanced prototyping mode. I understand that it’s still in Beta mode and I hope in the future it will actually be usable for integrating motion in a design system.Animation between statesIf I take a button from our brands design system, it would be very helpful to be able to keyframe states and variants. Maybe take a page from Rive’s book and add something like a State Machine.Text animationText animation is non-existent at the moment. If we want to create an animation of text being typed I’m not sure how we achieve this.TokenizationWhen exporting JSON, there are no tokens visible in the JSON file, it’s just raw values.Preset AnimationsThe preset animations are nice and all, but it would help immensely to be able to make a library of our own animations, so we can quickly build out motion components.Styles/ChoreographiesSimilar to how you can add multiple values to a typography and apply it as a style (c

would it be possible to add a moveable anchor point that can be switched on and off.so that when ever i pause the motion design the time line cursor (time indicating cursor ) starts at the anchor point it is a pain to fine tune animations when i have to drag the time line cursor to where i want or wait for the loop to finish to start at my spacific point this feature would be very use full for fine tuneing specifice areas in the motion design that require precisionthis feature could be upgraded to have multiple anchor point each toggleable with shortcuts say like the number keys (1,2,3,4,5)

Did Figma do a rug-pull with Agents recently? (< 2 weeks) Previously, with the exact same level of detail and instructions in prompts, I was singing Agents praises. This week it won’t follow simple instructions and each time admits it’s not paying close enough attention. Did Figma make a conscientious decision to downgrade underlying LLM?Based on recent utility, I’m better off doing it all myself. Not even out of Beta yet and already garbage.

Hello Figma Support TeamI’m here for an update to reduce my seats  which i have accidentally enabled by creating a design file, thank you. I am unable to prevent this from happening at certain times, 1 click on Continue , just immediately converts my present plan into the full seat, Won’t happen again, I’ve raised a request for this immediately after the disaster, I’m seeking support here for the visibility,(help.figma.com/hc/requests/2049844)Best,Vasanth

I’d like to share feedback regarding the implementation of AI credit limits in Figmake. As a designer managing multiple complex projects, I believe credit restrictions would greatly undermine Figmake’s usefulness in real-world design and prototyping workflows.  1. Most AI usage is for fixing bad or incomplete output, not luxury use.  In practice, a large percentage of AI prompts in Figmake are iterative—used to correct layout issues, rebuild misinterpreted elements, or align behaviors with visual intent. Each refinement quickly consumes credits even though the output quality depends on that iteration. Penalizing iteration limits the model’s ability to produce accurate prototypes, especially when the AI output is imperfect through no fault of the user, making credit usage really unfair and frustrating.2. Predictability becomes impossible, discouraging adoption.  With a credit cap that no one knows how to predict and calculate ahead of time, I can’t plan how far my Figmake usage will tak

Please enable Figma motion to work for “Change To” interaction in components. I use it in specific sections that change on click / mouse enter interactions but can’t use it because of this obstacle.Example: 1st, 2nd, and 3rd variant has animations. When I proto click → change to variant 2, the animation does not load. However if I have it looped, it starts after the full loop time length finishes for some reason.It works when using “Navigate To”, so for now I have to fake it by creating multiple frames of the full page instead of it simply working within the specific section.

错误：无法复制粘贴 Figma 环境中的交互：Windows，Figma 桌面应用 + Chrome 网页版 问题开始日期：2026 年 7 月中旬 重现步骤：1. 选择具有交互的图层 2.在原型面板内选择交互条目，或点击紫色面条连接器3。按Ctrl+C 4。选择目标图层，按Ctrl+V，结果：交互无法粘贴。它总是粘贴旧的剪贴板内容。预期：复制交互规则并粘贴到目标图层。我尝试过的排查方法包括：• 清除Figma桌面缓存 • 完全退出并重启桌面应用 • 硬刷新浏览器，无痕模式 • 验证浏览器剪贴板权限 • 在全新空白的Figma文件中测试 • 尝试分别选择noodle和原型面板交互行，所有尝试均失败。重要提示：这个bug存在于桌面应用和网页浏览器中，而不仅仅是网页版。

Hi Figma team,I'd love to see sorting preferences persist across sessions in the Projects view. Currently, every time I navigate into a project and return to the home screen, the sort order resets to default.Our team numbers all projects (01, 02, 03…) to maintain a clear workflow overview. Having to manually re-apply alphabetical sorting every single time is a small but repetitive friction point that interrupts the flow.It would be great if Figma could remember the last used sort order, ideally per user or workspace. This seems like a relatively simple improvement that would benefit many teams who rely on consistent project naming conventions.If this is already possible and I'm missing it, I'd love to know how.Thanks for considering this.Best,Justin Eleveld

Like many design systems, our current library uses placeholders + instance swap and we would love to switch to slots.The issue: While it’s possible to wrap placeholders in a slot to preserve content in existing instances, that content is no longer preserved when the instance swap property is removed from the original component. As soon as we remove the instance swap property from the parent component, all instances lose their swapped content.This means we have two options:Remove the property anyway and cause major breaking changes to hundreds of projects Accept redundant properties in the already crowded property panel for any component we switch from instance swap to slotsI’d be very happy if we could remove the property, or rather reassign its function to the new slot. 

https://app.weavy.aithe only way i could be 

HiI have just used Figma motion for a quick animation and in general it works ok, but I have noticed a few things:Gif export is low quality even it’s set to High. Grey colours show pixelated. I tried to export it at 2x and resizing the file. It does help with image quality but it obviously increases the file size which is the reason for exporting as gif in the first place. Trying to scale or rotate a layer automatically creates a keyframe when I don’t want to, this doesn’t happen with position.  I can’t keyframe component properties, it would be really helpfulIn all, it’s a great addition to figma. However, I have experienced some glitches on the desktop app, I hope having all of this stuff added doesn’t affect overall performance. It seems to improve when I quit the app and restart again.  Thank you.

Hey There - your ‘squares’ in Figjam are not squares, but squares with rounded corners and not quite squirkles. For all of us who know what they’re doing, please provide full control over all objects so we can create in the way that is needed. Thanks

At the moment, as far as I’m aware, the only keyboard shortcut for switching between different UI modes in Figma Design is ⇧ + D. This toggles between Design and Dev Mode. Where it starts to feel odd is if you’re in Draw or Motion and hit ⇧ + D, it brings you to Dev Mode. If you hit it again, you’re now in Design mode with no keyboard shortcut to switch back to your previously active mode.However, you can switch to Draw via the actions menu, but there is no keyboard shortcut. There is no option to switch to Motion via the actions menu.I propose adding dedicated shortcuts for each mode. Possible shortcut options:Design: ⇧ + ⎋ Escape Draw: ⇧ + W Motion: ⇧ + J or ⇧ + O Dev Mode: ⇧ + D (keep existing shortcut) Cycle mode forward: ⇧ + ~ Cycle mode backward: ⇧ + ~I also think all of these should be added to the actions menu as well. Even better, customizable shortcuts for any actions menu command would be amazing.

Ew. No. 

使用Agent频繁遇到无法访问PingFangSC字体的限制，希望可以解决 

Example:I have a bunch of elements that intentionally have a fixed height and width applied to them.I want to put them in a grid.When I do so - their width and height changes to fill. This is an unwanted destructive change and should be fixed or at least have a way to override.Is this how flex works in css? I don’t think it is - using display: flex - children keep their intrinsic size unless you explicitly opt into growing.

In Figma Make when chatting to the AI and writing bullet points, I expect hitting Enter to create a new bullet point, but it sends my incomplete chat to the agent, wasting me time and credits.

Hi Figma team,I’d like to share feedback about the new layer thumbnails / previews that appear in the Layers panel.These small background previews create a significant amount of visual noise. Instead of quickly scanning layer names, the eye is constantly drawn to the gray squares and tiny images.In practice this makes the panel harder to use when working quickly:White or light-colored icons become almost invisible on the gray thumbnail background. Many layers end up looking like nearly identical gray rectangles. Text names lose visual priority — you start looking at the pictures instead of reading the layer names. Overall scanability of the Layers panel drops noticeably, especially in large files with many similar components or icons.For fast everyday work the previous, cleaner list of layers (without these previews) was much more efficient. The current thumbnails rarely provide useful information and mostly add distraction.It would be great to have an option to turn these layer previe

Hi Figma team,I’d like to share some feedback on recent UI changes that affect everyday workflows. 1. Inconsistent way to apply number variables to Width / HeightPreviously it was easy to bind a variable to dimensions. Now the behavior is inconsistent:For Width and Height the only reliable way I’ve found is to click into the number field and press =. Right-click on the Width/Height field does not offer “Apply variable” (quick btn was the best). At the same time, at least right-click on Corner radius still shows “Apply variable”.The old quick affordances (variable icon / Apply variable in the dropdown) seem to have been removed from Dimensions and Corner radius, which makes the action much harder to discover. The = shortcut works, but it feels like a hidden workaround rather than a clear primary method.It would be great if Width/Height and Corner radius had the quick btns or at least the same right-click / hover affordances as Corner radius (and other numeric properties). 2. Create Comp