Skip to content

Use &IndexSlice instead of &IndexVec where possible - #109819

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
scottmcm:index-slice
Apr 3, 2023
Merged

Use &IndexSlice instead of &IndexVec where possible#109819
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
scottmcm:index-slice

Conversation

@scottmcm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

All the same reasons as for [T]: more general, less pointer chasing, and &mut IndexSlice emphasizes that it doesn't change length.

r? @ghost

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 31, 2023
@rustbot

rustbot commented Mar 31, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

@scottmcm scottmcm added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 31, 2023
@scottmcm
scottmcm force-pushed the index-slice branch 2 times, most recently from 77c9298 to b47b43b Compare March 31, 2023 17:17
@scottmcm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 31, 2023
@bors

bors commented Mar 31, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Trying commit b47b43b4f22bfb374597a0c8e8b683970867776d with merge 0e80712d44f9e728430eba2130bb30f813c99ad1...

@bors

bors commented Mar 31, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 0e80712d44f9e728430eba2130bb30f813c99ad1 (0e80712d44f9e728430eba2130bb30f813c99ad1)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0e80712d44f9e728430eba2130bb30f813c99ad1): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.0% [1.8%, 2.1%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.3% [-3.3%, -3.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-3.3%, -2.5%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.3% [-3.3%, -3.3%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.3% [4.9%, 5.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 31, 2023
@scottmcm

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

r? @WaffleLapkin
@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 31, 2023
All the same reasons as for `[T]`: more general, less pointer chasing, and `&mut IndexSlice` emphasizes that it doesn't change *length*.
@scottmcm

scottmcm commented Apr 3, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

(Update was just a rebase atop #109849, since it touched a couple of the same places.)


#[inline]
pub fn from_elem<S>(elem: T, universe: &IndexVec<I, S>) -> Self
pub fn from_elem<S>(elem: T, universe: &IndexSlice<I, S>) -> Self

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be nice to have documentation here, I don't really get why/how you'd use this method...

@scottmcm scottmcm Apr 3, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sent as PR #109913

@WaffleLapkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r+

@bors

bors commented Apr 3, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

📌 Commit a2ee759 has been approved by WaffleLapkin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 3, 2023
@bors

bors commented Apr 3, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

⌛ Testing commit a2ee759 with merge bf41e75...

@bors

bors commented Apr 3, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: WaffleLapkin
Pushing bf41e75 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 3, 2023
@bors
bors merged commit bf41e75 into rust-lang:master Apr 3, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.70.0 milestone Apr 3, 2023
@scottmcm
scottmcm deleted the index-slice branch April 3, 2023 20:52
@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (bf41e75): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.9% [-1.2%, -0.5%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.4% [3.4%, 3.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.8% [0.8%, 0.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.4% [3.4%, 3.4%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.0% [-2.0%, -1.9%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

aliemjay added a commit to aliemjay/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2023
Doc-comment  `IndexVec::from_elem` and use it in a few more places

Since this PR is a reply to rust-lang#109819 (comment),
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
compiler-errors added a commit to compiler-errors/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2023
Doc-comment  `IndexVec::from_elem` and use it in a few more places

Since this PR is a reply to rust-lang#109819 (comment),
r? ``@WaffleLapkin``
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants