2025-06-30
378 reads
2025-06-30
378 reads
2025-06-23
464 reads
Erik shows that heaps have even more drawbacks under optimistic concurrency.
2018-02-07
2,743 reads
You should stick to using tables in SQL Server, rather than heaps that have no clustered index, unless you have well-considered reasons to choose heaps. However, there are uses for heaps in special circumstances, and it is useful to know what these uses are, and when you should avoid heaps. Uwe Ricken explains, and demonstrates why you'd be unwise to use heaps rather than tables when the data is liable to change.
2016-10-14
3,646 reads
In SQL Server, heaps are rightly treated with suspicion. Although there are rare cases where they perform well, they are likely to be the cause of poor performance. If a table is likely to have a large number of changes, then it can become fragmented due to way that space is allocated and forward pointers used. How does one detect this problem? Is it significant? How does one deal with it, if necessary? Neeraj Tripathi explains.
2015-11-23
3,694 reads
2014-05-21
1,846 reads
When no clustered index is defined on a table, that table is said to be a Heap. Heaps are not ideal when it comes to performance but there are lots of instances where you have heaps.
2013-05-15
3,128 reads
By Steve Jones
I got a notification from a question I’d posted at SQL Server Central: Getting...
By SQLPals
SQL Server sa Account Security: Rename, Disable & Best Practices In...
By Brian Kelley
Artificial Intelligence and quantum computing are two areas of emerging technology that receive most...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Are You Working More Hours?
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Stairway to Reliable Database Deployments...
Comments posted to this topic are about the item A Limited Startup
I add this parameter to SQL Server 2025 in the Configuration Manager:
-mDynamicsWhat does this do? See possible answers