gh-119105: difflib.py Differ.compare is too slow [for degenerate cases] #119376
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
estyxx
pushed a commit
to estyxx/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2024
…e cases] (python#119376) Track all pairs achieving the best ratio in Differ(). This repairs the "very deep recursion and cubic time" bad cases in a way that preserves previous output.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A different approach, tracking all ascending index pairs achieving the best ratio. None of them needs recursion then. And, more importantly, it restores difflib's general "top to bottom" ordering of matches.