Skip to content

Conversation

@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity commented Nov 20, 2025

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity added needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes labels Nov 20, 2025
@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot added awaiting core review docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news labels Nov 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in Docs PRs Nov 20, 2025
@ZeroIntensity
Copy link
Member Author

ZeroIntensity commented Nov 20, 2025

@colesbury, if you have time, I'd really appreciate your expertise here (especially on the PyThread_exit_thread warning).

Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

If *intr_flag* is ``1``, acquiring the lock may be interrupted by a signal,
in which case this function returns :c:enumerator:`PY_LOCK_INTR`. Upon
interruption, it's generally expected that the caller makes a call to
:c:func:`Py_MakePendingCalls` to propagate an exception to Python code.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PyErr_CheckSignals() may be more appropriate than Py_MakePendingCalls(), no? Currently, it seems like Py_MakePendingCalls() is preferred.

Py_MakePendingCalls() is a superset of PyErr_CheckSignals(), so I'm fine with it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should use Py_MakePendingCalls, especially considering we use it ourselves in _thread.lock.

@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity merged commit a89ee4b into python:main Nov 25, 2025
32 checks passed
@ZeroIntensity ZeroIntensity deleted the document-pythread branch November 25, 2025 17:53
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in Docs PRs Nov 25, 2025
@miss-islington-app
Copy link

Thanks @ZeroIntensity for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13, 3.14.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
(cherry picked from commit a89ee4b)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Nov 25, 2025

GH-141954 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.14 bugs and security fixes label Nov 25, 2025
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
(cherry picked from commit a89ee4b)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Nov 25, 2025

GH-141955 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label Nov 25, 2025
ZeroIntensity added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
…41954)

gh-141004: Document missing `PyThread*` APIs (GH-141810)
(cherry picked from commit a89ee4b)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
ZeroIntensity added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
…41955)

* gh-141004: Document missing `PyThread*` APIs (GH-141810)
(cherry picked from commit a89ee4b)

Co-authored-by: Peter Bierma <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
StanFromIreland pushed a commit to StanFromIreland/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2025
ashm-dev pushed a commit to ashm-dev/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants