Skip to content

Conversation

@serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka commented Nov 3, 2022

In very rare circumstances the JUMP opcode could be confused with the argument of the opcode in the "then" part which doesn't end with the JUMP opcode. This led to incorrect detection of the final JUMP opcode and incorrect calculation of the size of the subexpression.

NOTE: Changed return value of functions _validate_inner() and _validate_charset() in Modules/_sre/sre.c. Now they return 0 on success, -1 on failure, and 1 if the last op is JUMP (which usually is a failure). Previously they returned 1 on success and 0 on failure..
(cherry picked from commit e9ac890)

pythonGH-98764)

In very rare circumstances the JUMP opcode could be confused with the
argument of the opcode in the "then" part which doesn't end with the
JUMP opcode. This led to incorrect detection of the final JUMP opcode
and incorrect calculation of the size of the subexpression.

NOTE: Changed return value of functions _validate_inner() and
_validate_charset() in Modules/_sre/sre.c.  Now they return 0 on success,
-1 on failure, and 1 if the last op is JUMP (which usually is a failure).
Previously they returned 1 on success and 0 on failure..
(cherry picked from commit e9ac890)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant