RAG Benchmarks: Embedding Models, Vector DBs and Rerankers
RAG improves LLM reliability by grounding responses in external data. We benchmark the RAG stack across embedding models, rerankers, vector databases, frameworks and evaluation tools on retrieval accuracy, latency and quality.
Explore RAG Benchmarks: Embedding Models, Vector DBs and Rerankers
Top 20+ Agentic RAG Frameworks
Agentic RAG enhances traditional RAG by boosting LLM performance and enabling greater specialization. We conducted a benchmark to assess its performance on routing between multiple databases and generating queries. Explore agentic RAG frameworks and libraries, key differences from standard RAG, benefits, and challenges to unlock their full potential. We used our agentic RAG benchmark methodology…
Open Source Embedding Models Benchmark for RAG
We benchmarked 14 open-source embedding models, self-hosted on a single H100, across 500+ manually curated retrieval queries spanning legal contracts, customer support tech notes, and medical abstracts. NVIDIA Llama-Embed-Nemotron-8B leads in accuracy. On cost, Google’s EmbeddingGemma-300m runs roughly 4x cheaper than Nemotron at the cost of a small accuracy loss. nDCG@3: Normalized discounted cumulative gain…
Multimodal Embedding Models: Apple vs Meta vs OpenAI
Multimodal embedding models excel at identifying objects but struggle with relationships. Current models struggle to distinguish “phone on a map” from “map on a phone.” We benchmarked 7 leading models across MS-COCO and Winoground to measure this specific limitation. To ensure a fair comparison, we evaluated every model under identical conditions using NVIDIA A40 hardware…
RAG Evaluation Tools: Weights & Biases vs Ragas vs DeepEval
When a RAG pipeline retrieves the wrong context, the LLM confidently generates the wrong answer. Context relevance scorers are the primary defense. We benchmarked five tools across 1,460 questions and 14,600+ scored contexts under identical conditions: same judge model (GPT-4o), default configurations, and no custom prompts. Under standard conditions, WandB, TruLens, and Ragas emerged as…
Top 10 Multilingual Embedding Models for RAG
We benchmarked 10 multilingual embedding models on ~606k Amazon reviews across 6 languages (German, English, Spanish, French, Japanese, Chinese). We generated 1,800 queries (300 per language), each referencing concrete details from its source review. Models trained for search (query vs document separation) outperform larger models trained for general text similarity: e5_base (110M params) outperforms models…
Embedding Models: OpenAI vs Gemini vs Voyage
We benchmarked 15 English text-embedding models and a BM25 baseline on over 500 manually curated queries across three retrieval domains: legal contracts (CUAD), customer support (IBM TechQA), and healthcare (MedRAG PubMed). Voyage-3.5 ranks first overall. Perplexity Embed V1 0.6b reaches the upper-mid tier at the lowest price point in our benchmark. nDCG@3: Normalized discounted cumulative…
RAG Frameworks: LangChain vs LangGraph vs LlamaIndex
We benchmarked 5 RAG frameworks: LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, Haystack, and DSPy, by building the same agentic RAG workflow with standardized components: identical models (GPT-4.1-mini), embeddings (BGE-small), retriever (Qdrant), and tools (Tavily web search). This isolates each framework’s true overhead and token efficiency. The benchmark consisted of 100 queries, with each framework running the full set…
Reranker Benchmark: Top 8 Models Compared
We benchmarked 8 reranker models on ~145k English Amazon reviews to measure how much a reranking stage improves dense retrieval. We retrieved top-100 candidates with multilingual-e5-base, reranked them with each model, and evaluated the top-10 results against 300 queries, each referencing concrete details from its source review. The best reranker lifted Hit@1 from 62.67% to…
