Skip to content

Clarify if bondAtomList and bondOrderList are optional for groups too #33

Description

@gtauriello

It would be great to clarify in the specs if it is acceptable for an MMTF file to have groupType objects (see https://github.com/rcsb/mmtf/blob/master/spec.md#grouplist) with missing bondAtomList and bondOrderList fields.

The reason why this needs clarification is that the bondAtomList and bondOrderList fields exist also on a global level (see https://github.com/rcsb/mmtf/blob/master/spec.md#bondatomlist) where they are optional (you can either have neither of them, only bondAtomList or both).

The discussion on this was started in rcsb/mmtf-cpp#9 and rcsb/mmtf-cpp#10.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions