Test drop_tracking_mir before querying generator.

[cjgillot]

r? @ghost

[cjgillot]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 1d3f5b4 with merge dedcd09ba9ab62b2f519bbb146ecd9133b70f60f...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: dedcd09ba9ab62b2f519bbb146ecd9133b70f60f (dedcd09ba9ab62b2f519bbb146ecd9133b70f60f)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (dedcd09ba9ab62b2f519bbb146ecd9133b70f60f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.7%, -0.2%]	13
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.7%	[-1.1%, -0.4%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-0.7%, -0.2%]	13

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.7%	[1.7%, 1.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.5%	[-4.5%, -4.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.0%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

[rustbot]

Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations

cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt

[cjgillot]

r? compiler

[compiler-errors]

r? @compiler-errors @bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 1d3f5b4 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 1d3f5b4 with merge 9c0ee1a97e8d08204a9b9244b2ff87c792ed8537...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[compiler-errors]

@bors retry spurious time="2023-01-31T00:02:12Z" level=error msg="error waiting for container: unexpected EOF"

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 1d3f5b4 with merge dc3e59c...

[rust-log-analyzer]

The job aarch64-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

      |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/checkout/src/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/ModuleSummaryIndex.h:710:3: note: parameter passing for argument of type ‘llvm::FunctionSummary::FFlags’ changed in GCC 9.1
[926/3023] Building CXX object lib/Transforms/IPO/CMakeFiles/LLVMipo.dir/PruneEH.cpp.o
[927/3023] Building CXX object lib/Transforms/IPO/CMakeFiles/LLVMipo.dir/PassManagerBuilder.cpp.o
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing dc3e59c to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (dc3e59c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.6%, -0.2%]	14
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.7%	[-1.0%, -0.4%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.6%, -0.2%]	14

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.0%	[3.0%, 3.0%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.2%	[0.9%, 7.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.0%	[3.0%, 3.0%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1