patches: bump to 18.2.0

[baparham]

Local build seemed to work by just keeping the patch the same from 18.1.0, so I'll propose this change and await feedback if it needs more work or changes in other areas.

Thanks for any guidance!

Fixes #249

[baparham]

@jesec Is this patch missing anything? Let me know if you think there is something else you think I should do here.

[jesec]

There is a bunch of applied with delta. We want the patch to have no such divergence.

[baparham]

I don't see applied with delta but perhaps that's just a difference in our toolchains. I see this for the patching portion:

> Applying patches
patching file common.gypi
patching file deps/v8/include/v8-initialization.h
patching file deps/v8/src/api/api.cc
patching file deps/v8/src/codegen/compiler.cc
patching file deps/v8/src/objects/js-function.cc
patching file deps/v8/src/objects/shared-function-info-inl.h
patching file deps/v8/src/parsing/parsing.cc
patching file deps/v8/src/snapshot/code-serializer.cc
patching file lib/child_process.js
patching file lib/internal/bootstrap/pkg.js
patching file lib/internal/bootstrap/pre_execution.js
Hunk #1 succeeded at 29 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 124 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 580 (offset -41 lines).
patching file lib/internal/modules/cjs/loader.js
patching file lib/internal/modules/package_json_reader.js
patching file lib/vm.js
patching file src/inspector_agent.cc
patching file src/node.cc
Hunk #1 succeeded at 482 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 602 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 617 (offset -1 lines).
patching file src/node_contextify.cc
Hunk #2 succeeded at 702 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 726 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 779 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 799 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 832 (offset -8 lines).
patching file src/node_main.cc
patching file src/node_options.cc
patching file tools/icu/icu-generic.gyp

Are you referring to the offset N lines comments? my goal is to adjust the patch so that they successfully apply without such an offset, correct?

[baparham]

I've reworked the patch file to apply without the offsets. Please let me know if this is what you meant @jesec

Thanks for the help!