You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
PEP 582: Possible new API in sysconfig for paths/scheme #3013
Right now PEP 582 asks for a new scheme in the sysconfig module. But, a possible another option is a new API (function) and then the tools will have to build up the whole scheme using it.
Should this be an issue on the PEPs repo, or would it be more appropriate as a CPython issue and/or Packaging Discourse discussion? At least historically, issues in the PEPs repo have mostly been used for meta items related to the PEPs process, infra, theme, etc. itself, and to document and discuss editorial defects in existing PEPs, whereas discussion of substantive changes to CPython or PEP content are directed elsewhere.
It could maybe be in then steering council repo also?
I'm not sure the SC repo is the place to brainstorm new potential additions to a particular PEP— I would suggest only bringing it to the SC's attention if nessesary when submitting the PEP for final approval. As Pradyun suggested, Kushal's fork would be a great place for that.
Activity
CAM-Gerlach commentedon Feb 14, 2023
Should this be an issue on the PEPs repo, or would it be more appropriate as a CPython issue and/or Packaging Discourse discussion? At least historically, issues in the PEPs repo have mostly been used for meta items related to the PEPs process, infra, theme, etc. itself, and to document and discuss editorial defects in existing PEPs, whereas discussion of substantive changes to CPython or PEP content are directed elsewhere.
FFY00 commentedon Feb 14, 2023
It could maybe be in then steering council repo also?
pradyunsg commentedon Feb 14, 2023
I'd suggest that this be on Kushal's fork's issue tracker instead.
CAM-Gerlach commentedon Feb 15, 2023
I'm not sure the SC repo is the place to brainstorm new potential additions to a particular PEP— I would suggest only bringing it to the SC's attention if nessesary when submitting the PEP for final approval. As Pradyun suggested, Kushal's fork would be a great place for that.
kushaldas commentedon Feb 27, 2023
Closing this issue as I opened kushaldas#3