Skip to main content
archive Search
Submit Donate Log in

Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:1903.12261 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Mar 2019]

Title:Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations

Authors:Dan Hendrycks, Thomas Dietterich
View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations, by Dan Hendrycks and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In this paper we establish rigorous benchmarks for image classifier robustness. Our first benchmark, ImageNet-C, standardizes and expands the corruption robustness topic, while showing which classifiers are preferable in safety-critical applications. Then we propose a new dataset called ImageNet-P which enables researchers to benchmark a classifier's robustness to common perturbations. Unlike recent robustness research, this benchmark evaluates performance on common corruptions and perturbations not worst-case adversarial perturbations. We find that there are negligible changes in relative corruption robustness from AlexNet classifiers to ResNet classifiers. Afterward we discover ways to enhance corruption and perturbation robustness. We even find that a bypassed adversarial defense provides substantial common perturbation robustness. Together our benchmarks may aid future work toward networks that robustly generalize.
Comments: ICLR 2019 camera-ready; datasets available at this https URL ; this article supersedes arXiv:1807.01697
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1903.12261 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:1903.12261v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.12261
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Dan Hendrycks [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 Mar 2019 20:56:37 UTC (2,891 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations, by Dan Hendrycks and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Additional Features

  • Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CV
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • SciX
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Dan Hendrycks
Thomas G. Dietterich
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation (opens in new tab) Simons Foundation International (opens in new tab) Schmidt Sciences (opens in new tab)
Advertisement
Advertisement