[None][chore] Remove closed bugs

[xinhe-nv]

Remove closed bugs from waives.txt

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Reduced waived test cases to enable stricter test enforcement across multiple testing categories.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[xinhe-nv]

/bot run

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR removes 37 waived test entries from the test waiver list file, reducing the number of currently skipped tests across multiple test categories. No structural changes, new tests, or logic modifications are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Test Waiver Updates tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt	Removed 37 SKIP entries from various test categories including CLI flow, LLaMA/GPT tests, disaggregated serving, multimodal, and Nemotron-related tests.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• [None][chore] Remove closed bugs #10586: Directly modifies the same waives.txt file by removing SKIP entries
• [None][chore] Remove closed bugs #7408: Removes SKIP/waive entries from tests/integration/test_lists/waives.txt (un-waiving tests)
• [None][chore] Remove closed bugs #10182: Modifies waives.txt and removes SKIP waiver entries for overlapping tests

Suggested reviewers

• crazydemo
• LarryXFly

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	The description is minimal but provides the core information. However, it lacks the structured sections (Description, Test Coverage, PR Checklist) specified in the template.	Expand the description to include the standard sections: provide details about which bugs were removed and why, document relevant test coverage, and complete the PR checklist items.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title '[None][chore] Remove closed bugs' directly matches the PR's purpose of removing closed bugs from the waives.txt file, making it clear and specific.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #33525 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: e6f1b1b

[tensorrt-cicd]

PR_Github #33525 [ run ] completed with state SUCCESS. Commit: e6f1b1b
/LLM/main/L0_MergeRequest_PR pipeline #25861 completed with status: 'SUCCESS'