[local exchange](fix) Fix correctness caused by local exchange#41555
[local exchange](fix) Fix correctness caused by local exchange#41555Gabriel39 merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40984 ms |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 192084 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 33.14 s |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40822 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 192210 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 33.34 s |
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
…e#41555) For plan `local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg`, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling. This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.
Proposed changes
For plan
local exchange (hash shuffle) -> union -> colocated agg, we must ensure local exchange use the same hash algorithm as MPP shuffling.This problem is covered by our test cases but only can be reproduced on multiple BEs so no case is added in this PR.