[fix](outfile) fix analysis error when specifying parquet schema#57232
Merged
morningman merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Oct 22, 2025
Merged
[fix](outfile) fix analysis error when specifying parquet schema#57232morningman merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
morningman merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 189827 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.87 s |
Contributor
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
CalvinKirs
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2025
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
hubgeter
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2025
dwdwqfwe
pushed a commit
to dwdwqfwe/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2025
…che#57232) ### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: apache#33016 Introduced from apache#33016, when specify the "schema" property in outfile clause with parquet format, it will return error: ``` Parquet schema number does not equal to select item number ``` This is because we wrongly analyze `OutfileClause` twice.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
) ### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: #33016 Introduced from #33016, when specify the "schema" property in outfile clause with parquet format, it will return error: ``` Parquet schema number does not equal to select item number ``` This is because we wrongly analyze `OutfileClause` twice.
morningman
added a commit
to morningman/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
…che#57232) Related PR: apache#33016 Introduced from apache#33016, when specify the "schema" property in outfile clause with parquet format, it will return error: ``` Parquet schema number does not equal to select item number ``` This is because we wrongly analyze `OutfileClause` twice.
morningman
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Related PR: #33016
Introduced from #33016, when specify the "schema" property in outfile clause with parquet format,
it will return error:
This is because we wrongly analyze
OutfileClausetwice.Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)