Fix invalid suggestion for mismatched types in closure arguments#114256
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jul 30, 2023
Merged
Fix invalid suggestion for mismatched types in closure arguments#114256bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
The invalid suggestion came from a wrongly created span in `rustc_parse' for closure arguments that didn't have a type specified. Specifically, the span in this case was the last token span, but in the case of tuples, the span represented the last parenthesis instead of the whole tuple, which is fixed by taking the more accurate span of the pattern.
Collaborator
|
(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
WaffleLapkin
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2023
| @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | |||
| // check-fail | |||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wait, actually, can you make this into // run-rustfix test? (also // check-fail is the default iirc, you don't need it)
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately no, since the current suggestion is not enough to fix the issue; but applying it will lead to another suggestion which fixes the issue.
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
…pkin Fix invalid suggestion for mismatched types in closure arguments This PR fixes the invalid suggestion for mismatched types in closure arguments. The invalid suggestion came from a wrongly created span in the parser for closure arguments that don't have a type specified. Specifically, the span in this case was the last token span, but in the case of tuples, the span represented the last parenthesis instead of the whole tuple, which is fixed by taking the more accurate span of the pattern. There is one unfortunate downside of this fix, it worsens even more the diagnostic for mismatched types in closure args without an explicit type. This happens because there is no correct span for implied inferred type. I tried also fixing this but it's a rabbit hole. Fixes rust-lang#114180
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98154 (merge functionality of `io::Sink` into `io::Empty`) - rust-lang#102198 (`const`-stablilize `NonNull::as_ref`) - rust-lang#114074 (inline format!() args from rustc_middle up to and including rustc_codegen_llvm (3)) - rust-lang#114246 (Weaken unnameable_types lint) - rust-lang#114256 (Fix invalid suggestion for mismatched types in closure arguments) - rust-lang#114258 (Simplify `Span::can_be_used_for_suggestions` a little tiny bit) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the invalid suggestion for mismatched types in closure arguments.
The invalid suggestion came from a wrongly created span in the parser for closure arguments that don't have a type specified. Specifically, the span in this case was the last token span, but in the case of tuples, the span represented the last parenthesis instead of the whole tuple, which is fixed by taking the more accurate span of the pattern.
There is one unfortunate downside of this fix, it worsens even more the diagnostic for mismatched types in closure args without an explicit type. This happens because there is no correct span for implied inferred type. I tried also fixing this but it's a rabbit hole.
Fixes #114180