Using X headings instead of 0.X #49739#49742
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
steveklabnik
left a comment
steveklabnik
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ugh, thank you. I always forget that this does this on this page.
|
@bors: r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit ee880b9 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Using X headings instead of 0.X rust-lang#49739 Fix rust-lang#49739
Using X headings instead of 0.X rust-lang#49739 Fix rust-lang#49739
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #49510 (Fix anchor position on fields) - #49652 (Fix anchors issue when everything is collapsed) - #49702 (std: Inline some Termination-related methods) - #49728 (add emit_debug_gdb_scripts target option and ..) - #49731 (add THUMB targets to rustup manifest) - #49742 (Using X headings instead of 0.X #49739) - #49748 (proc_macro: Improve Debug representations) - #49750 (bootstrap: Remove the fast path) - #49503 (Inject the `compiler_builtins` crate whenever the `core` crate is injected) Failed merges:
4 participants
Fix #49739