Skip to content

Merge back 10.5.0 20200703#37648

Merged
micbar merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
merge-back-10.5.0-20200703
Jul 8, 2020
Merged

Merge back 10.5.0 20200703#37648
micbar merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
merge-back-10.5.0-20200703

Conversation

@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@phil-davis phil-davis commented Jul 3, 2020

Description

Merge back the current diffs between release-10.5.0 and master to master

Then we can delete the release-10.5.0 branch that was used for making 10.5.0RC3 and when we are ready we can branch again from master1 before creating RC4.

This will allow us to easily include various stuff like Transifex translation commits that are in master and would otherwise need to be backported...

To make this PR I did:

git fetch origin
git checkout master
git pull
git checkout release-10.5.0
git pull
git checkout -b merge-back-10.5.0-20200703
git rebase master
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Applying: Prepare 10.5.0 changelog
Applying: Bump version in version.php
Applying: Update icewind/smb v3.2.4 and other files_external/3rdparty dependencies
Applying: Bump icewind/smb 3.2.5 and google/apiclient 2.5.0
Applying: Updating google/apiclient-services (v0.138 => v0.139) in apps/files_external/3rdparty
Applying: Bump version in version.php

And it happily did the rebase without any conflicts, and ended up with just a reasonable set of commits that are the things from release-10.5.0 that are not already in master. i.e. the icewind/smb version bumps, ownCloud changelog, and ownCloud RC version bumps.

2020-07-06PM - rebased to latest master and added the commits from the new tip of release-10.5.0 (from PR #37654

How Has This Been Tested?

CI

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Database schema changes (next release will require increase of minor version instead of patch)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:
  • Changelog item, see TEMPLATE

@phil-davis phil-davis requested a review from micbar July 3, 2020 13:44
@phil-davis phil-davis self-assigned this Jul 3, 2020
@owncloud owncloud deleted a comment from update-docs bot Jul 3, 2020
@phil-davis phil-davis force-pushed the merge-back-10.5.0-20200703 branch from dcce726 to 0e17351 Compare July 3, 2020 15:02
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #37648 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master   #37648   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     64.74%   64.74%           
- Complexity    19360    19363    +3     
=========================================
  Files          1281     1281           
  Lines         75622    75628    +6     
  Branches       1333     1333           
=========================================
+ Hits          48959    48966    +7     
+ Misses        26271    26270    -1     
  Partials        392      392           
Flag Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
#javascript 54.03% <ø> (ø) 0.00 <ø> (ø)
#phpunit 65.93% <ø> (+<0.01%) 19363.00 <ø> (+3.00)
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
lib/private/legacy/util.php 74.95% <0.00%> (+0.42%) 222.00% <0.00%> (+3.00%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9687d77...3641f1d. Read the comment docs.

@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@micbar merge-back is ready if you would like to do that.

@phil-davis phil-davis force-pushed the merge-back-10.5.0-20200703 branch from 0e17351 to b269ede Compare July 6, 2020 16:29
@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@micbar do this merge-back?

@micbar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

micbar commented Jul 7, 2020

@phil-davis We need to merge the other branch.
There were additions to the branch.

@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

phil-davis commented Jul 7, 2020

@micbar I updated this branch already from the latest on release-10.5.0 branch, including the commits from #37654

@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@phil-davis We need to merge the other branch.
There were additions to the branch.

Note: release-10.5.0 does not merge "automagically", GitHub claims that there are conflicts. We have to do something like this to merge the content (or someone with privs has to do a rebase of release-10.5.0 and force-push it, which seems more risky to me)

@phil-davis phil-davis force-pushed the merge-back-10.5.0-20200703 branch from b269ede to 3641f1d Compare July 8, 2020 12:47
@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@micbar I rebased to get fresh CI against latest master.
Are we going ahead and doing this?
Please review.

@micbar micbar merged commit 81c30cf into master Jul 8, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the merge-back-10.5.0-20200703 branch July 8, 2020 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants