Skip to content

Conversation

@unidata-pr-helper
Copy link
Contributor

Backport #3815 onto the 1.7.x stable branch.

Instead of just assuming we should fall back to the geostationary
perspective_point_height support, check to see if that attribute is even
available, otherwise there's no point in trying.

This wasn't done in the first place because it wasn't clear there were
other projections with valid coordinates that couldn't be converted to
meters.

(cherry picked from commit d152ace)
@unidata-pr-helper unidata-pr-helper bot added Area: Projections Pertains to projecting coordinates between coordinate systems backport Pull Requests that are automatically back-ported to the stable release backported-pr A Pull Request that is a version of another but to the stable branch labels May 28, 2025
@unidata-pr-helper unidata-pr-helper bot requested a review from jthielen as a code owner May 28, 2025 17:54
@unidata-pr-helper unidata-pr-helper bot added the Type: Bug Something is not working like it should label May 28, 2025
@unidata-pr-helper unidata-pr-helper bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2025 17:54
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the backport Pull Requests that are automatically back-ported to the stable release label May 28, 2025
@unidata-pr-helper unidata-pr-helper bot requested review from dopplershift and removed request for a team May 28, 2025 17:54
@dopplershift dopplershift merged commit 546cc50 into 1.7.x May 28, 2025
39 checks passed
@dopplershift dopplershift deleted the backport-pr-3815 branch May 28, 2025 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area: Projections Pertains to projecting coordinates between coordinate systems backported-pr A Pull Request that is a version of another but to the stable branch Type: Bug Something is not working like it should

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants