rustc --help add --cfg SPEC declaration.#110594
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @oli-obk (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (
|
rust --help add --cfg SPEC declaration.rustc --help add --cfg SPEC declaration.
|
r? @jyn514 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I think this was already correct in 8d5a742: |
|
Also, please squash the commits into one so we don't end up with a binary in the git history. |
use name[=value] syntax. Signed-off-by: clundro <859287553@qq.com>
|
@jyn514 It's done. I misunderstood it before |
|
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#108416 (black_box doc corrections for clarification - Issue rust-lang#107957) - rust-lang#109379 (Replace `yes` command by `while-echo` in test `tests/ui/process/process-sigpipe.rs`) - rust-lang#110266 (Update documentation wording on path 'try_exists' functions) - rust-lang#110329 (Improve tests for rust-lang#110138) - rust-lang#110418 (Spelling rustdoc) - rust-lang#110587 (Fix `std` compilation error for wasi+atomics) - rust-lang#110594 (`rustc --help` add `--cfg` SPEC declaration.) - rust-lang#110792 (Use the standard macOS CI runner) - rust-lang#110817 (Add regression tests for const-generic inherent associated types) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustc --helpshould defineSPEC#110462